Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 2 Newby questions on load development with a 6BR for F-Class competition

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Grand Blanc, MI
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,677
    Also, not to beat you up, but WHY do you turn your .308 necks for as little neck tension as possible? It's my understanding that people turn necks only after confirming THEIR rifle shoots better that way. Or they have tight chambers and need smaller OD necks so as to fit the chamber. Or, just for the sake of trying to get more consistent neck tension, but lighter tension is not necessarily better than heavy tension. Usually what matters is CONSISTENCY. From what I've read, not everyone benefits from it. Some like light tension so they can seat them long and then allow the rifling to seat the bullet deeper so they know it's always seated against the lands. But again, if it doesn't actually shoot better against the lands, it's not worth the effort. Finally, just because my barrel shoots better that way, does not mean yours will. There is no scientific explanation that says a cartridge OUGHT to be constructed a certain way. All that matters is that you find what works for your barrel and construct them that way.

    Good luck.

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    248
    I started in march to tune up a 6 BR and have the following suggestions. Using 0.5 gr increments is too wide. Try 0.3 or so because you can miss a node. I found that using Berger 105 hybrids the best seating depth was a light touch, Not hard jam. I also found that neck tension built on successive firings with a conventional die. I now have a redding bushing die. You must have a bullet comparator and a micrometer seating die. Half way through the process I had to start over due to pillaring and actin bedding The action

  3. #3
    ClayC
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by strut64 View Post
    I started in march to tune up a 6 BR and have the following suggestions. Using 0.5 gr increments is too wide. Try 0.3 or so because you can miss a node. I found that using Berger 105 hybrids the best seating depth was a light touch, Not hard jam. I also found that neck tension built on successive firings with a conventional die. I now have a Redding bushing die. You must have a bullet comparator and a micrometer seating die. Half way through the process I had to start over due to pillaring and actin bedding The action
    I do in fact have a bullet comparator and a micrometer. I got lucky and bought 1000 105g Berger Hybrids all in the same lot so I lucked out there and that is what I have been using. I have to admit, that Redding micrometer is the best I have ever used. I keep measuring though the whole series but I generally never have to readjust once its set.

    Did you use a chronograph for to test your standard deviation or did you just measure your vertical spread?

  4. #4
    ClayC
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by foxx View Post
    Also, not to beat you up, but WHY do you turn your .308 necks for as little neck tension as possible? It's my understanding that people turn necks only after confirming THEIR rifle shoots better that way. Or they have tight chambers and need smaller OD necks so as to fit the chamber. Or, just for the sake of trying to get more consistent neck tension, but lighter tension is not necessarily better than heavy tension. Usually what matters is CONSISTENCY. From what I've read, not everyone benefits from it. Some like light tension so they can seat them long and then allow the rifling to seat the bullet deeper so they know it's always seated against the lands. But again, if it doesn't actually shoot better against the lands, it's not worth the effort. Finally, just because my barrel shoots better that way, does not mean yours will. There is no scientific explanation that says a cartridge OUGHT to be constructed a certain way. All that matters is that you find what works for your barrel and construct them that way.

    Good luck.
    Honestly, consistent neck tension more then anything. Its pretty much that simple. I know there are a lot of opinions out there. For myself, I use Lapua brass and every lot I have ever trimmed had inconsistent neck thickness. From there its just my education. I was taught by the guys that I shoot with that you just neck resize. Seat your bullet, measure the neck and use a bushing a bit smaller.
    So basically I learned that's what to do, Midway and everyone else sells the items needed to do it and the top shooters I personally know told me to do it so it was just what I did. Pretty simple.
    Now that being said, the guys I shoot with win matches when I shoot with them at AEDC in Tullahoma, TN; Miami, OH and various other places. They are shooting High Master @ 600 yards with a 590-22X or higher score. My personal best is 575. Not the top of the pack but respectable.

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Grand Blanc, MI
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,677
    Quote Originally Posted by ClayC View Post
    Honestly, consistent neck tension more then anything. Its pretty much that simple. I know there are a lot of opinions out there. For myself, I use Lapua brass and every lot I have ever trimmed had inconsistent neck thickness. From there its just my education. I was taught by the guys that I shoot with that you just neck resize. Seat your bullet, measure the neck and use a bushing a bit smaller.
    So basically I learned that's what to do, Midway and everyone else sells the items needed to do it and the top shooters I personally know told me to do it so it was just what I did. Pretty simple.
    Okay, now. THAT makes sense to me. Honestly, so far I have not seen a need to turn the necks. I trust it can be necessary, though. When I do, it will be as you stated here. What didn't quite make sense to me was getting as "little neck tension as possible." That sounded a bit arbitrary to me. Again, please, try different depth and different tensions (if necessary to allow for seating into lands) and report. I would be interested in your results. :)

Similar Threads

  1. 22-243 load development?
    By zr600 in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-02-2017, 06:30 PM
  2. Questions about a 111 from a Newby to Savages
    By papabearxx in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2016, 06:14 PM
  3. OCW help and other load development
    By scooterf79 in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-17-2016, 01:25 AM
  4. Load Development: How to?
    By handsomerob in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-19-2012, 08:55 AM
  5. Load development for .300 Win Mag
    By dsculley in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 10:11 AM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •