Results 1 to 25 of 57

Thread: Same idea..but using Titanium & Tungsten Carbide. (Pics)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    LOL! You know what I meant Robin. But nice “get” on me, haha.

    Sorry..let me expound. I meant EXTRA parts on the outside that don’t need to be there except for not wanting to complete a task. As shortening the bolt. But I’ll say, the one you showed is nice. Can’t even see the spacer! Did you do that?

  2. #2
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,819
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    LOL! You know what I meant Robin. But nice “get” on me, haha.

    Sorry..let me expound. I meant EXTRA parts on the outside that don’t need to be there except for not wanting to complete a task. As shortening the bolt. But I’ll say, the one you showed is nice. Can’t even see the spacer! Did you do that?

    What do you think?
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Very nice machining. Oh wait.... is that the same one with the swept back bolt you made?

    I agree with what you said... “Shnazzy”! Can’t see any separation between the bolt & washer. Way outta my league! I make functional parts with “ok” machining finish. But my machining is novice compared to that!

    In in other words.. I like it. Great stuff my friend.

  4. #4
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,819
    LOL Dave, You are more full of it than me.

    It was just a different approach. Tried several versions including one like the PT&G and then a version with a rolling ball end set screw. Nothing like the exotic metals you use though. The 4140 is close to 30 RC and the balls are like 60 .
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    LOL Dave, You are more full of it than me.

    It was just a different approach. Tried several versions including one like the PT&G and then a version with a rolling ball end set screw. Nothing like the exotic metals you use though. The 4140 is close to 30 RC and the balls are like 60 .
    Is it worth drilling and tapping the .357 case to use a set screws with a ball that turns like the one above?

  6. #6
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,819
    Quote Originally Posted by jkv45 View Post
    Is it worth drilling and tapping the .357 case to use a set screws with a ball that turns like the one above?
    Sorry JKV45, The BAS is drilled and tapped(this is a 6mm screw) in a collet, in the lathe. It could probably be done a couple of ways but it must be on center and concentric! The flat surface is machined out of round stock to fit in the sleeve like the case does . It is kind of reverse from the pistol case setup. The stack height is very low, something like 3/32 or less. If you machine the screw back it can even be a negative number. Be careful with shortening the whole system too much. You don't want the cocking pin in the sleeves entry slot.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  7. #7
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    Sorry JKV45, The BAS is drilled and tapped(this is a 6mm screw) in a collet, in the lathe. It could probably be done a couple of ways but it must be on center and concentric! The flat surface is machined out of round stock to fit in the sleeve like the case does . It is kind of reverse from the pistol case setup. The stack height is very low, something like 3/32 or less. If you machine the screw back it can even be a negative number. Be careful with shortening the whole system too much. You don't want the cocking pin in the sleeves entry slot.
    Thanks.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    LOL Dave, You are more full of it than me.
    Oh...well I apologize. I’m not purposefully trying to be full of anything. Sorry

  9. #9
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    387
    When I added My 38 spcl & ball, the added length was .079”. I took that amount off the back of the cocking sleeve. It works fine.

    Did I do wrong ?

  10. #10
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,819
    Quote Originally Posted by GrenGuy View Post
    When I added My 38 spcl & ball, the added length was .079”. I took that amount off the back of the cocking sleeve. It works fine.

    Did I do wrong ?
    The only thing you could have done was weaken or distort the sleeve. If you didn't, I can't see why it would be wrong. .079 is thin. Must have used a 5/32 ball.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

Similar Threads

  1. 223 fs die w/ carbide ball
    By chetc in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-19-2016, 10:26 PM
  2. Titanium action screws
    By junkout in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-19-2015, 07:07 PM
  3. Titanium parts for Savage
    By brasse in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-13-2015, 11:45 AM
  4. "Burnt Titanium" Cerakote
    By Rifleshooter308 in forum Picture Post
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-27-2014, 09:41 PM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-17-2014, 04:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •