My first two Savages were accustocks, .260 and .223, and they were both 1/2 MOA at 100yds or better. I later decided I wanted them on a Tacticool instead. They are now closer to .3 MOA at 100 yds after adding pillars and bedding. I have no way of knowing if the Tacticool made them better or if I am just a better shooter and hand loader than when I started.
Correction: my 260 was originally a Trophy Hunter. My second accustock was a 25-06. It shot better than 1/2 moa but I wanted a factory walnut stock of the American Classic style, so I bought one from Numrich and immediately pillared and bedded it so it now shoots 1/3 MOA or better as well. Again, I have no idea if the Accustock hindered me at all. I truly doubt it. Would I buy another? No, because I don't like synthetic stocks. I'd rather pillar and bed my own wood stocks. Are they good? I believe so.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks