If anything--an aircraft would be FAR more vulnerable to crosswinds/headwinds etc because in general they are flying slower than a bullet and present far more surface area to generate drag. A modern bullet is truly a work of aeronautical art--and it is because of it's remarkable design and performance that enable them to largely "evade" the environmental effects of winds.

I think now would be a good time for a true bullet ballistician to step in--somebody who actually designs bullets for hornady, sierra, berger etc. I'm saying that the majority of the effect on a bullet's trajectory in a head or tailwind is due to increase or decrease in drag in the ambient airmass--not a mere increase or decrease in winds physically exerting enough force to alter the bullet's path. I would love to be told my illusion is wrong--if it is! : )