Because we know what the approximate rate of rotation is for bullets, and thanks to things like high-speed photography and other nifty technologies we have a pretty good understanding of the behavior of bullets when they travel through the target...and neither things suggest any saw-like effects on tissue.
There's a fair amount of physical evidence and peer-reviewed research that support the theory of hydrostatic shock. Not so much for Santa or the tooth fairies.
Which is why I said it depends on how you're using the word "speed". Had you included in your previous post a quote of what it was you were responding to then that question would have been answered.
Bookmarks