Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Well, that was disappointing

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    448

    Well, that was disappointing

    Shot the 6.5 Creedmoor today that I got late yesterday. Groups from 1 1/2"-over 2". I am hoping it is the mounts being improperly torqued. I know what you are saying, I should have checked them first but I didn't. I really don't know what they were on the scope itself but it didn't take much effort at all. On the base mount I set the torque screwdriver on 5# and it removed them. It could have been maybe 3 or even 2#, who knows. I am mounting a higher quality scope, Loctiting the base screws to 20" # and the rings to 17. I hope this helps. This is factory ammo so that could be part of it too but not a great start.

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Central Arizona
    Posts
    450
    I'm sure that was a big part of the problem if not all of it.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Is it a combo rifle from Savage, or did you have someone else install the components. I stress to anyone purchasing a combo, or any rifle for that matter, check not only the Scope Base(s) & rings, but also the Action screws. Loosen & re-torque to proper specs. Loctite on base screws only. And if you don’t know how, LEARN!

    Here are Action screw Torque specs. (Leave the rear a bit less)
    https://service.savagearms.com/hc/en...action-screws-

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    Is it a combo rifle from Savage, or did you have someone else install the components. I stress to anyone purchasing a combo, or any rifle for that matter, check not only the Scope Base(s) & rings, but also the Action screws. Loosen & re-torque to proper specs. Loctite on base screws only. And if you don’t know how, LEARN!

    Here are Action screw Torque specs. (Leave the rear a bit less)
    https://service.savagearms.com/hc/en...action-screws-

    Yes, it was a package gun. I should have known better but I wanted to try it out. I mounted a Bushnell 6-24 scope this morning, put blue Loctite on the base screws, 25 " # of torque, 35 on the rail mount, 17 on the rings. Waiting for the Loctite to dry, probably try it again tomorrow. I adjusted the trigger and torqued them to 40. The user manual said 40. I think the Axis has a different torque spec than the 110.

    It's funny how they price things. $400 for the package gun, $400 for the same gun bare. I knew the scope wouldn't be great but I figured at the least I could use the base mount. Rings were too small for the Bushnell scope.

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,748
    I used the combo scope on my Axis for a couple of years. It was a cheap Bushnell 4-12. Plain duplex reticle but it seemed to track really well. Optical clarity wasn't the best but it worked. When I got a Vortex for it I gave the scope to a guy on the Cast Boolits forum. He's still using it 4 yrs later.

  6. #6
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    Is it a combo rifle from Savage, or did you have someone else install the components. I stress to anyone purchasing a combo, or any rifle for that matter, check not only the Scope Base(s) & rings, but also the Action screws. Loosen & re-torque to proper specs. Loctite on base screws only. And if you don’t know how, LEARN!

    Here are Action screw Torque specs. (Leave the rear a bit less)
    https://service.savagearms.com/hc/en...action-screws-
    Dave, do you recommend starting at the lower end of the ranges? Middle? In practicality, how much difference in performance should one expect with incremental changes between 30 and 35 ft/lbs? Both of my Savage rifles ( 223 which is a combo and a used17HMR with scope from Guns International ) arrived with mounted scopes. Both are sub-MOA capable at 100 yards, so I`ve left everything alone. What to look for if action screws or scope related screws loosen up?

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Turkeytider View Post
    Dave, do you recommend starting at the lower end of the ranges? Middle? In practicality, how much difference in performance should one expect with incremental changes between 30 and 35 ft/lbs? Both of my Savage rifles ( 223 which is a combo and a used17HMR with scope from Guns International ) arrived with mounted scopes. Both are sub-MOA capable at 100 yards, so I`ve left everything alone. What to look for if action screws or scope related screws loosen up?
    I don’t. I’ve never really been one of the Action screw “tuners”, so to speak. Never really noticed any difference myself. I do leave the rear screw just a bit less. But I mean 5–10in.lbs. Even then, I haven’t noticed any difference. But, some people do. So they say. Honestly.. I think there is more difference in .2gr difference in charge weight when reloading, than with trying to tune Action Screw torque. I’m not a believer in the rifle having some perfect harmonics setting, where a couple Inch.Lbs. of torque will make a discernible difference. I’m a believer in creep. The screws should be as tight as possible without stressing either the Action or Stock.

    But that’s just me. I would never tell someone NOT to test it themselves! No sir.. I am a fundamental believer in DIY research. Your results may vary from my own. And especially with such an easy set of parameters to test. Right?

  8. #8
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,748
    Just to make sure...it is not 30-35 FT-lb. In-lb Use a 'little' torque wrench, not the one you use on cars.

    FWIW, the action torque tune only works if the action is properly bedded to start with. If not you will be chasing your tail.

    With a bedded action and pillars I have not seen a difference with screw torque. I think it is very dependent on the stock you are using.

  9. #9
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    I don’t. I’ve never really been one of the Action screw “tuners”, so to speak. Never really noticed any difference myself. I do leave the rear screw just a bit less. But I mean 5–10in.lbs. Even then, I haven’t noticed any difference. But, some people do. So they say. Honestly.. I think there is more difference in .2gr difference in charge weight when reloading, than with trying to tune Action Screw torque. I’m not a believer in the rifle having some perfect harmonics setting, where a couple Inch.Lbs. of torque will make a discernible difference. I’m a believer in creep. The screws should be as tight as possible without stressing either the Action or Stock.

    But that’s just me. I would never tell someone NOT to test it themselves! No sir.. I am a fundamental believer in DIY research. Your results may vary from my own. And especially with such an easy set of parameters to test. Right?
    Thanks Dave. And I meant in.lbs, not ft. lbs.

  10. #10
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Age
    59
    Posts
    35
    Is it a new rifle? Remember you have to break the bore in. I would not look for accuracy until I had at least 50 rounds through it. Shot 2 clean the bore. Shoot 2 clean the bore. Shoot 5 clean the bore. Repeat 5 for 25 rounds then increase to 10 rounds until you get to 50 or 60 rounds through the bore. Now you can begin to look for accuracy.

Similar Threads

  1. Mark I/II/93R: Disappointing
    By Idaho in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-16-2017, 07:36 PM
  2. Mark I/II/93R: Disappointing MKII Accuracy
    By TLEN in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-13-2014, 06:44 PM
  3. Disappointing day with my Savage F/TR
    By UK-Shootist in forum Competitive Shooting
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-21-2013, 12:21 PM
  4. B-Mag Series: Disappointing .17 WSM ammo results and B Mag 'flexi-flyer' stock fix
    By n4ue in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-07-2013, 01:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •