Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: How critical is the quality of the barrel nut?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Basic Member darkker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Columbia Basin, WA
    Posts
    2,408
    I have no problem with arguing the merits of uneven stresses. But I take exception to the notion that the barrel suddenly can't be square in the receiver, as was stated, save with a squared nut.

    As to the original question of "importance". It stuns me still how a $250-$400 Savage with all it's poorly squared faces can shoot so good, and not require $500-1,000 to work right; So much so that the popularity increases to the point that the same Savage is now costing $600-800, suddenly we "Need" parts, just to be able to Mount our scopes....

    As I said before, I have no issue with fashion, just call it what it is.
    I'm a firm believer in the theory that if it bleeds, I can kill it.

  2. #2
    Savage6x284
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by darkker View Post
    I have no problem with arguing the merits of uneven stresses. But I take exception to the notion that the barrel suddenly can't be square in the receiver, as was stated, save with a squared nut.

    As to the original question of "importance". It stuns me still how a $250-$400 Savage with all it's poorly squared faces can shoot so good, and not require $500-1,000 to work right; So much so that the popularity increases to the point that the same Savage is now costing $600-800, suddenly we "Need" parts, just to be able to Mount our scopes....

    As I said before, I have no issue with fashion, just call it what it is.
    I don't believe that anyone claimed that Savage rifles were "poorly squared". On the contrary, Fred noted that the method by which the barrel nut is manufactured virtually ensures them to be square with the bore axis.
    No other part of the Savage action was claimed to be consistently and egregiously out of perpendicularity (square if you will) either.
    Jim may have used the phrasing he used to point out a worst case scenario. I do not know.

    I bought my first new Savage 110 series rifle in the mid '80s or thereabout. I'm pretty certain that it cost me more than $250 for that bottom of the line 110. That, say $300, is the equivalent of $672 in 2014. It seems to me that the price for Savage rifles has pretty faithfully tracked the rate of inflation and have not been increased due to greater demand.

    To your point about being "stunned" that inexpensive Savage rifles shoot so well given their prices I would say that the lowish prices are more likely due to the $6 IM stocks and a mechanical design which lends itself to easy and rapid production of parts using automated means and inexpensive, readily available raw materials. Steel tubing rather than an expensive and much more labor intensive forging for the bolt body as an example.
    Another very large factor in keeping the costs low and the quality high is the incredible advances in machine tool technology within the last 30 years or so. IIRC Savage did a major retooling of their plant at least once during these 30 years. Old and worn machinery was replaced by new machinery which was both FAR more productive and capable of significantly greater precision.
    A sound Nick Brewer design coupled with much faster, more accurate machine tools means higher productivity. The decision Savage made to stick with button rifling and hand straightened barrels means that the most significant source of the renowned Savage accuracy is still maintained.

    A trued barrel nut is a rather insignificant expense when placed in the context of the overall cost of a custom build and may enter the realm of "why not"
    If I were to build a nutted Savage there would be no question that a 10 minute stint on the lathe to true up the nut would be done as a matter of course.

    Finally, a rather large part of the appeal of Savage rifles is that they are among the easiest rifles for a gunowner to modify. Most are justifiably proud of their efforts and the $40 spent on a trued nut is insignificant if for no other reason that knowing the job was "done right".

  3. #3
    northlander
    Guest
    I am not at liberty to explain how our barrel nuts are made but we do run them on the CNC twice, before and after heat treat to a 40 Rockwell to assure that they are correct. Heat treating causes issues that require squaring.

    Several Gunsmiths go into detail as to why their action services include "Trueing" the barrel nut. If this is not relevant, why are they doing it and why are they charging for it?

    Jim Briggs
    NSS
    Last edited by northlander; 09-16-2014 at 11:33 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Quality Used 6-24X scopes
    By bsekf in forum Optics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-12-2016, 05:14 PM
  2. Mark I/II/93R: Looking for 93GL(lefty) quality threaded barrel, any recommendations
    By r_thunder77 in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-10-2016, 12:41 PM
  3. How critical is case volume?
    By Idaho in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 02-27-2016, 02:40 PM
  4. SMK quality vs ???
    By jsimonh in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-13-2012, 02:26 AM
  5. Scope quality
    By r29l20 in forum Optics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 03:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •