Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: At what point do I need better base/rings?

  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    48

    At what point do I need better base/rings?


    I have used Leupold Standard rings and bases for years with no problems. Before that I'd had trouble with cheaper rings a couple times.

    My scope use has only been informal target shooting and hunting but I'm gonna start shooting several precision competitions. Currently building a Savage .223 with Nikon Buckmaster 4.5x-14x that I'm going to start shooting Benchrest and reduced F-Class. Planning a Savage .260 with either a Sightron SII Big Sky or Leupold MK4 for the same use, with the goal of competing in Practical Precision competition.

    The sniper boards push the heavy expensive Picatinny-rail setups as being mandatory but I just don't see it. Any experienced opinions on this subject?
    Stevens 200, .260/ Sin Arms Brux #7, 24"/ Stockade Woodchuck/ Rifle Basix SAV1/ Nikon Buckmaster 4x-14x-40mm

  2. #2
    Dirk
    Guest

    Re: At what point do I need better base/rings?

    The Leupold rings and bases are very good and will be fine. As you probably realize, anything that hints of "tactical" is now COOL. Go with your gut.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Blue Avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,973

    Re: At what point do I need better base/rings?

    the picatinny's are handy for those needing there eye relief in EXACTLEY THE RIGHT SPOT. other styles do not offer that ability. after that fact I do not see any reall advantage over any other quality set up.
    .223 Rem AI, .22-250 AI, .220 Swift AI .243 Win AI, .6mm Rem AI, .257 Rob AI, .25-06 AI, 6.5x300wsm .30-06 AI, .270 STW, 7mm STW, 28 nosler, .416 Taylor

  4. #4
    Don - LongRangeSupply
    Guest

    Re: At what point do I need better base/rings?

    The biggest problem with two piece bases is they are rarely in alignment with each other.

    If you don't use Burris Signature rings then you will almost always need to lap them to get a stress free mounting.

    After some 40 years of mounting scopes, the picatinny rail is by far the most versatile system I have ever used. You don't have to spend a fortune on a picatinny setup. Get an EGW rail and some Burris Signature Zee rings and you will have a state of the art mounting system that will give you a stress free setup that also allows adjustment in any direction, plus rarely damages the scope finish.

    With the same base on all your guns moving scopes around is a simple operation.

  5. #5
    Dirk
    Guest

    Re: At what point do I need better base/rings?

    With the screw hole alignment problems that a great number of Savage receivers seem to display, I've found that Burris or Leupold steel rotary dovetail front and windage adjustable rear bases with Burris steel Signature Z rings to be ideal for any type of 1 inch or 30mm scope application.

  6. #6
    EGW1
    Guest

    Re: At what point do I need better base/rings?

    One of the Big issues we have seen on the Savage is the holes needing to be re tapped to clean them out not so much on alignment.

    Thanks for the plug!
    geo




Similar Threads

  1. New base and rings
    By Idaho in forum Member Builds & Range Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-17-2017, 09:23 AM
  2. 310 base/rings help
    By tfm64 in forum Optics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2013, 01:17 AM
  3. 12 LRP base and rings
    By crowe284 in forum Optics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-16-2012, 08:33 AM
  4. MidwayUSA Dogtown Bullets, Hollow Point or Soft Point
    By Baryngyl in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-23-2012, 11:05 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-06-2012, 08:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •