They lead you on also and say the rule is not meant to go after people with gun "collections" or an "occasional" sale. They also say they are not after people who inherit guns and sell them. The problem is if you read deeper it becomes a menagerie of words, that only a person with great skills learned in debunking a maze could get through.

27 CFR Part 478[Docket No. ATF 2022R-17;

Heres the example where they say its okay folks we wont go after you!
AG Order No. ]RIN 1140-AA58
Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms

Bottom of page 5
"At the same time, the final rule expressly recognizes that individuals who purchase firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or a legitimate hobby are permitted by the GCA to occasionally buy and sell firearms for those purposes, or occasionally resell to a licensee or to a family member for lawful purposes, without the need to obtain a license"

Heres an off the wall comment but something to think about:

The State Department did not manufacture guns but they bought them and in 2022 sold guns to 57% of the authoritarian regimes. Is this not a clear violation of page 25 "Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms" which states:
"Therefore, unlicensed persons who purchase firearms in the United States and smuggle or take them out of theUnited States (or conspire or attempt to do so) for resale in another country are nowengaging in conduct that is unlawful under the GCA." GCA is the Gun Control Act of 1965

So is the Justice Department (ATF) making rules that the State Department is violating? Maybe that would be a good place for the NRA to start driving in its screw to this ridiculous rule!