Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

  1. #1
    Loggy
    Guest

    Savage 93G VS 93FV ??


    In the market for a 22WRM.

    Looking at the Savage 93G(sporting bbl w/wood stock) VS the 93FV(heavy bbl w/syn stock).

    Will be primarily a hunting rifle. Going to use mainly for squirrel & groundhogs.

    Any pros & cons of either model??

    Much appreciate any input!


    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Age
    53
    Posts
    195

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    pro: the heavier barrel / syn stock will usually give you better performance in the end as that combination is less apt to succumb to weather vs. expansion / contraction of a wood stock, and barrel harmonics are reduced with the heavier barrel.

    con: it is a heavier barrel, and probably will become heavier the older you get.

    still, for a groundhog setup, i'd go with the heavy barrel, especially if taking shots 100+ yards. the extra accuraccy / consistancy the heavier barrel gives at those longer distances starts to pay off for the weight factor, IMO.
    a craftsman can't realize his full potential, without finding the potential of the tools he uses....

  3. #3
    Basic Member bootsmcguire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    2,892

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    I have the 93FV pre-accutrigger. Love it. I would go with the Heavy barrel for sure. In a rimfire i do not think it is all that heavy and is not a bother for me to carry on the trail at all. Mine is a tack driver with Win Supreme ammo.
    204, 22 K-Hornet, 222, 223, 22-250, 22-250AI, 6BR, 243, 243AI, 6-06, 6-WSM, 250-3000AI, 270, 7-08, 7RM, 30BR, 308, 30-06, 375 H&H, 444 Marlin, 450BM, 458WM

  4. #4
    forger
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    The bull barrel will likely give better groups..be sure you get the accutrigger though..it is worth much. Just this past week bought a 93F for a "woods walker" rifle. I have bull barrels, but as Top Predator said, they have gotten heavier over the years !
    I have an excuse though.... I'll be 75 in September.. :D

  5. #5
    264fan
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    Go with the FV, mine weighs 7 lbs 2 oz with a Bushnell 4-12x40 and balances well offhand.

  6. #6
    Reno1
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    I have the FV. With My 4-16X40 Centerpoint, it weighs only 7.45 lbs. I have found it easier to hold steady while standing/aiming/hunting, with the heavier bull barrel. I would actually like to add some weight to the rear synthetic stock. Perhaps .5 to 1 lb. Any ideas? Nailed a jack at a measured 161 yards earlier this week. Today another at about (I'm guessing) 120 yards. I won't be going back to a .22LR for a while. 8)

  7. #7
    Loggy
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    Thanks for all the great input!!

    A new 22 Win Mag 93FV will be arriving next week!!

  8. #8
    Reno1
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    Quote Originally Posted by Loggy
    Thanks for all the great input!!

    A new 22 Win Mag 93FV will be arriving next week!!
    Now you need to find some good ammo and scope.

  9. #9
    ljv308
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    Just purchased a Savage 93 FVSS and ordered a Nikon 3x9x40 Prostaff scope.I plan zero @ 100 yards with a Remington 40 gr JHP. This is going to be my setup for dispatching the wylie coyote.Just wondering if anyone on this forum is using a similar setup?

  10. #10
    ljv308
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    Quote Originally Posted by Reno1
    I have the FV. With My 4-16X40 Centerpoint, it weighs only 7.45 lbs. I have found it easier to hold steady while standing/aiming/hunting, with the heavier bull barrel. I would actually like to add some weight to the rear synthetic stock. Perhaps .5 to 1 lb. Any ideas? Nailed a jack at a measured 161 yards earlier this week. Today another at about (I'm guessing) 120 yards. I won't be going back to a .22LR for a while. 8)
    Yeah, a piece of 3/4 inch diameter PVC,2 glue in plugs, and some Copper BB'S. Cut it about 7-8 inches long and pack the pipe with the BB's and stuff in some cotton balls before you glue on the last plug.

  11. #11
    Tracer
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    My wife has the 93 with regular barrel and iron sights to boot, I have the heavy barrel with no iron sights. Now both have proved to be very accuate at 50 to 75 yards. I get .675 inches at 50 yards and .768 at 75 yards with my heavy barrel 93 Savage rifle.

  12. #12
    forger
    Guest

    Re: Savage 93G VS 93FV ??

    As I said above, I have recently gotten a 93F w/accutrigger. I have had 2 Marlins in .22 mag, 2 Anschutz in .22 mag, an Ithaca lever in .22 mag and sighted in nothers for friends. Some of these were good, some weren't worth spit !
    I sighted in my new 93 the other day..and I can confidently tell you it is the most accurate .22 mag I've ever shot !!

Similar Threads

  1. Mark I/II/93R: Anyone Shooting A Savage 93FV-SR In .17 HMR ??
    By billt in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-17-2015, 10:00 PM
  2. Mark I/II/93R: Savage 93FV
    By titus2423 in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-21-2011, 02:17 PM
  3. Mark I/II/93R: 93fv (.22wmr)
    By Reno1 in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 02:39 PM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •