Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36

Thread: torquing barrel nut

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704

    Yes, you are correct. Sorry. The math involved before hand.. finding the Pitch Radius using ES, TD &TD2 is extremely important. Forgive my over simplification of simply the thread height. But it’s still numbers in, settings made and threads come out. There’s no mysticism.. no art, right? The machine only knows to do what the user tells it. And of course it’s tolerance holding capability, right? My point was a slightly tighter/loser nut doesn’t add to accuracy potential. (And I’m speaking about bore/thread cutting squareness) But the actual “play”, only matters to the clamping torque, right?

    I think Fuj’ had a bad specimen. It happens. I’ve had two of these & they don’t rock when threaded on. But they aren’t as tight as other nuts I’ve felt.

  2. #27
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,725
    Play in the nut should not matter that much. The squared faces of receiver and nut along with the concentricity of the threads of the barrel and receiver are the important parts. A corollary can be made to a shouldered barrel. The barrel threads and shoulder must be square to the receiver threads and face. The taper of the threads will 'center' the barrel in the receiver bore when it is torqued down.

    The play in the nut will affect the strength of the threaded portion. Not really an issue for our application.

    I would assume (bad thing) that most of these nuts are being made on a CNC. If so it could be as simple as someone setting up the machine wrong, or having an improper cutting bit installed. If the mfg relies on manual QC they might not check carefully enough. Easy enough to mess it up. Sometimes a nice phone call or email can fix the issue.

  3. #28
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,792
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie b View Post
    The taper of the threads will 'center' the barrel in the receiver bore when it is torqued down.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  4. #29
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,725
    Do you think something else will center the barrel? There is slop in all threaded connections. The receiver face and nut face will make the barrel stay in line with each other, but, neither will center the barrel.

  5. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    I certainly defer to Robin on single point threading. I couldn’t tell you which bits work best, or give pointers. I simply understand the “HOW To” of doing it. Conceptual knowledge, I don’t have working knowledge as I don’t have a lathe.

  6. #31
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,792
    There are forces being applied outside of the thread surfaces being pulled together. Those forces can and do pull barrels off center. When you move that thread off center the barrel now is held back on the side that closes up and that pushes the muzzle in the opposite direction. I have spent the time with test indicators and V-blocks and loose thread fits never have satisfied my tolerences. I could have done something wrong. The plan is to get everything right but sometimes a theory kicks your butt.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  7. #32
    Basic Member Fuj''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Erie, Pa. U.S.A.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    802
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    There are forces being applied outside of the thread surfaces being pulled together. Those forces can and do pull barrels off center. When you move that thread off center the barrel now is held back on the side that closes up and that pushes the muzzle in the opposite direction. I have spent the time with test indicators and V-blocks and loose thread fits never have satisfied my tolerences. I could have done something wrong. The plan is to get everything right but sometimes a theory kicks your butt.
    Yes Sir !! I've run the mill on just about every aspect, of fitting things up.
    Spent more hours on the bench then I should have. I have 7 nuts in a box
    that I went thru to always find the one that is the tightest fit for a particular
    barrel. I also have 3 PTA actions that I pick to have the tightest barrel thread.
    A sloppy action fit, combined with a sloppy nut equals target disasters. Other
    then my fire forming barrels, all my PTA barrels are shouldered.
    Keeping my bad Karma intact since 1952

  8. #33
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2023
    Posts
    11
    You do realize that the distance from the center of the barrel to the square hole in the wrench for the 1/2" square drive will multiply the torque applied. By how much I don't know. I don't use a torque wrench, just tighten them by feel.

  9. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Quote Originally Posted by 25-204 View Post
    You do realize that the distance from the center of the barrel to the square hole in the wrench for the 1/2" square drive will multiply the torque applied. By how much I don't know. I don't use a torque wrench, just tighten them by feel.
    Not when the the barrel nut wrench is positioned 90 degrees on the Torque wrench. Torquing in this fashion yields precise values. This is known by those familiar with Savage & other Barrel Nut setups. (AR15,AR10)

  10. #35
    Team Savage
    Join Date
    Aug 2023
    Location
    Southeast Louisiana
    Age
    73
    Posts
    168
    Old thread, but comes up often.
    Torque with wrench IN LINE has a multiplier.
    Arithmetic, not Algebra.
    I have an 750 in lb wrench that I calibrated (just me being anal) @ 600 inch pounds (50 ft lbs) with dead weight.
    Distance from drive center to center of grip area is 11 inches.
    My barrel nut wrench is 1.5" from center of nut to center of 1/2" drive socket.
    The multiplier for this set up is total length (11" + 1.5") divided by torque wrench length (11").
    When wrench clicks @ 50 ft lbs, the multiplier makes the applied torque 13.6% higher, or 57 ft lbs.
    Many want to hold everything with the torque wrench 90 degrees to the barrel nut wrench which is fine.
    I just find it easier to hold with the two in line.

  11. #36
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    central Indiana
    Posts
    17
    I am more confused after reading this than before

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Skeptical about Action Screw Torquing affecting accuracy
    By BODAB in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-05-2018, 01:01 PM
  2. DIY inch pound torquing scope mount
    By timtiminy in forum Optics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-23-2013, 06:18 AM
  3. Mark I/II/93R: Torquing For Best Accuracy
    By dksac2 in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-03-2012, 12:18 AM
  4. Torquing Action Screws
    By bigedp51 in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 09:44 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 07:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •