Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Savage 6.5 Creedmoor PRS

  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Age
    75
    Posts
    8

    Savage 6.5 Creedmoor PRS


    I have an early PRS savage model 12 with a very heavy barrel that needs a new one. Any one rebarreled one of these before? I dont see any one offering a barrel as heavy as the original.

  2. #2
    Basic Member Fuj''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Erie, Pa. U.S.A.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    806
    I run heavier on all my 12 PTA's. But then again, all mine are custom cut from blanks
    and shouldered. My advice is always to check with Northland Shooters Supply. They will
    handle your large shank pre fit needs if that's the direction your going. If going with a
    blank, I always check "Bugholes" first. They will carry Bartlien, Brux, and Krieger for
    cut riflng. I would also check with Hart. I believe they now do barrels for Savage. The
    blanks I have used from them in the past have been shooters. and fast lead times.
    Keeping my bad Karma intact since 1952

  3. #3
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,729
    How much do you want to spend? Budget barrels, such as factory takeoffs, or EABrown, are limited in the profiles and lengths available.

    Northland carries Criterion and Shilen. They come in many contours, several of which are heavier than the Savage barrel. Fuj' also lists most of the best barrel makers, but, they are a bit more expensive as well. Krieger sometimes has 6.5CM Savage prefits in stock.

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    58
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by arnie View Post
    I have an early PRS savage model 12 with a very heavy barrel that needs a new one. Any one rebarreled one of these before? I dont see any one offering a barrel as heavy as the original.
    Greetings! When you talk about "as heavy" are you referring to weight or profile? If you hit the Northland Shooters Supply link below and go to Savage prefit barrels, Criterion for example offers a 6.5 Creedmoor in a 28" barrel that 6.0 pounds for a bull that is 1.0" at the muzzle. Is that lighter than your current? I have a '94 Savage 112 in 300 Win Mag and it tapers to 0.800" at the muzzle. I'll eventually rebarrel to a bull, either Criterion or Shilen.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Like Fuj’ said, Bugholes!

  6. #6
    Basic Member Spudgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Central, Wi.
    Posts
    51
    when it came time to re-barrel my first 6.5 CM I looked at Ragged hole barrels. They offer barrels threaded, chambered and crowned. I paid $250.00 for a heavy barrel 3 years ago. I think they have now raised there prices some.

    The barrel shot great groups at 600 and 1000 Yds. I shot out the barrel in about 1.5 years and then got a Brux barrel which I am using now.

    Gave the old barrel to one of the guys I shoot with and had him re-chamber and re-crown the old one. It's waiting for me to ware out the brux barrel and I will reuse it.

    If your capable changing a barrel on the Savage actions is a breeze. I can do a barrel change out in about 20 min.

  7. #7
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    The Criterion and Shilens at NSS are good enough for most. X-caliber has been good for this guy. The Brux barrels are hot right now and you can't go wrong with a Bartlien or Kreiger either. I don't think bugholes carries a bad barrel. Gunsmiths do screw up chambering. Go with somebody that knows what .0002" is.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    The Criterion and Shilens at NSS are good enough for most. X-caliber has been good for this guy. The Brux barrels are hot right now and you can't go wrong with a Bartlien or Kreiger either. I don't think bugholes carries a bad barrel. Gunsmiths do screw up chambering. Go with somebody that knows what .0002" is.

    Two TEN-THOUSANDTHS of an inch?? For firearms? That’s like Optics quality precision.

  9. #9
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,729
    If you are looking at the highest left of accuracy in a rifle you want that kind of accuracy in a setup.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    I think it’s a bit unrealistic WITHOUT very high cost machinery & tooling. Like several $100,000’s high cost.

  11. #11
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    I think it’s a bit unrealistic WITHOUT very high cost machinery & tooling. Like several $100,000’s high cost.
    Dave, as an experienced machinist, please describe the machinery and process that requires a Smith to use $100,000 indicate and hold that kind of Run Out please.


    Here is a hint:





    Change the chuck out for something that holds the work closer to the headstock. Get your adjustable tailstock on centerline with the udjustment screws and possibly shims. Buy the tooling, throw in a NOGA and < 20K you're the chit.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Yes… thank you Robin. I’m quite familiar. That’s a 504 “pocket” series gauge. Popular tool… With the “Jeweled” bearings, and “Carbide” contact points…(as if most gunsmiths had a clue what that meant!) They are high quality pieces, and sell typically for under $150. They also have, as it turns out, a .0002”+/- ACCURACY… So if the user does does everything PERFECT, and the “Jeweling” on dem bearings hasn’t worn none…, that is the absolute best it can possibly do...0002”. How convenient. Now a Mitutoyo 543 digital.. it has a .0001” accuracy, but it’s digital, and we hate those, right? Need to worry about batteries and such. Plus, it costs between $350-$400, and who wants to spend that for a test gauge?

    Ill add this. If your tooling & part both have a .001 deflection & they are set counter to one another, what happens to that variation? Now, the incredibly expensive equipment used by large companies, have tooling that accounts for & can detect an error like that.

    I’m not saying you can’t hit level of accuracy. Just that your post made it sound like that was your starting point for accuracy. When, in fact that is your end goal. That is the best which can be be accomplished, given perfect circumstances, with what you provided.

  13. #13
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    Dave, as an experienced machinist, please describe the machinery and process that requires a Smith to use $100,000 indicate and hold that kind of Run Out please.


    Here is a hint:





    Change the chuck out for something that holds the work closer to the headstock. Get your adjustable tailstock on centerline with the udjustment screws and possibly shims. Buy the tooling, throw in a NOGA and < 20K you're the chit.
    .0002 with a hammer tracked 3 jaw is pretty impressive. What is a NOGA please?

  14. #14
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    58
    Posts
    114
    I think NOGA is the machine manufacturer... https://www.noga.com/

  15. #15
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    Quote Originally Posted by TXRoadlizard View Post
    I think NOGA is the machine manufacturer... https://www.noga.com/
    The machine is a 80's vintage 15" Clausing Colchester. A very worthy machine with broadly available parts. The picture was taken from the internet as was the indicator. It serves my purpose.

    Quote Originally Posted by gbflyer View Post
    .0002 with a hammer tracked 3 jaw is pretty impressive. What is a NOGA please?

    gbflyer, If you read the original text below the pictures in my post, you will see that I stated to change the work holding system. A 3 jaw chuck will rarely be able to grab anything that close and as you may well know you cannot indicate a 3 jaw unless you have a Buck or Buck style adjustable 3 or 6 jaw chuck. Some may use removable soft jaws and machine the holding surface while in the lathe to ensure a better grip or less RO. Three jaw chucks cant handle interrupted heavy cuts and other issues. They are good for their intended purpose and there are some tricks to improve RO but still not as good as an individually adjust jaw. If you want to get into conversations about what would be the best option to hold the barrel we can do that, off line is cool with me. Keep in mind that barrel chambering is not what I do as a proffession.


    Noga is an indicator base that is used by many machinist. Most notably ones that do precision repair or low quantity precision work. It's method of holding, positioning and adjusting the indicator has been difficult to surpass. Here is the manufacturers web site, a little difficult to brows. Look for "Articulating Holders" on the web page or on....Google. https://www.noga.com, if you are a machinist you will see the advantages of a NOGA immediately. If you are a machinist you will already know the name like Brown and sharp, Starrett or even Mitutoyo. I use the NOGA's mostly with Test indicators but I do have two that I kept with linear travel indicators for HBMs or other mills.

    One

    Dave I really appreciate what you do to help some people on this forum. When you want to challenge someone with some outlandish information, make sure you are not selling wolf cookies. Have the goods, and not google goods. Not someone else's goods. Sell your stuff. I really did not want to go here but the issue is being pushed.

    David, lets be real. You nor I are gunsmiths. You are not a machinist by profession and it is my bet that most of the machining you take ownership of is done by someone else. No shame in that, especially with your condition. Much machinig requires the use of 2 hands and arms. I think they are possibly your ideas but not your work. You are also a Google guy. Nothing wrong with that(Google Fu is important in today's world, but don't sell google info as your personal experience. My desire is not to bust your chops, I just think we should all stay in our lane. When we reach the limit of our knowledge we should listen to the person with experience. This is why you mostly shy away from many technical conversations if we are being honest. you realize your limitations most of the time and stay in that lane.

    The particular indicator i posted a picture of was chosen because of its reach deeper to get into a small bore, there are better options, and I have spent some serious money on them to be able to perform the work that brings in stupid good pay. Plus you sounded like there was nothing out there for less than $50,000 that could hold close RO readings, so I pulled up a quick example. There are better much more expensive indicators you can use but Some of them are probably overkill. Inexperience led you to conclude that the tolerance specs of the indicator states it can't hold .0002' tolerance for low RO or TIR. The spec you cited is the tolerance durring the indicators maximum travel it can be guaranteed to be accurate to within that toleranceof +/- .0002" or a total of .0004" from one end of the rotational travel to the other end of rotation.


    If the indicator dial does not move and is not bottomed out, it is not reading the .0004" you read in the specs. If there is with zero movement. It is in fact very close to "0". This is a completely different and a misrepresentation of reality to say that indicator can't show very close to an acceptable zero tenths TIR. Since we are discussing tenths of an inch, I would rather think I was zero and be off .0004" than think I was within .001 and be off and additional .001 and have .002 TIR. Thats just me.


    I have had the opportunity to test the ability of a mechanical indicator for customers that required an electronic or even lazer TIR run out recordings for Q.A. This was for 60 or120 hz turbines and high speed gearboxes with shafts running from 3600, 7200 rpm and > 50,000 rpm. Very expensive high speed equipment. This has nothing to do with guns or rifle bores but it does qualify my opinion of indicators if you are willing to believe me and accept my claims.


    For those that use an indicator everyday to make a living(42 years for me) in a precision machine shop(with high precision grinding machines), what I am stating is not that far fetched. For individuals that have want people to believe they are more that they are, for individuals constantly bragging at patting themselves on the back, often don't recognize that others may have skills at a level that tey can't even comprehend.

    Dave, I try not to put information out there that misrepresents my knowledge. I am guilty of acting like an ass. I am also guilty of pretending I was an expert in things I only had partial knowledge of. I often miss the mark when trying to diagnose issues. As a empath, it bothers me when I give errant information. I don't know what it is like to be a sociopath.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  16. #16
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    503
    Thanks for the info on the indicator holder. I have a knock off version of the same. That’s a nice looking well kept machine. Except for that chuck. Haha.

  17. #17
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    I agree. I did put one on an older Lodge and Shipley I used to break edges or re-face some parts on something I had parted off after finishing the ID and OD. diameter RO's are not as critical. Face parallelism is usually kept to <.0005 and is surface ground if it can't be maintained in the lathe(rare). Most everything is a 4 jaw or Buck Chuck in the shop.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Duplicate

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Ya know.. just not worth it. I’ve never lied here. Show examples or it’s just you talking!

    Ive never said I did any of this for a living. I’ve only ever said I was a Hobbyist! Please, show me where I said any different? Otherwise it’s just you talking.

  20. #20
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    Ya know.. just not worth it. I’ve never lied here. Show examples or it’s just you talking!

    Ive never said I did any of this for a living. I’ve only ever said I was a Hobbyist! Please, show me where I said any different? Otherwise it’s just you talking.

    I’m a Gunsmith, Knifemaker, & Machinist…with ONE arm! What’s your SUPERPOWER?
    :)
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  21. #21
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hoback View Post
    Ya know.. just not worth it. I’ve never lied here. Show examples or it’s just you talking!

    Ive never said I did any of this for a living. I’ve only ever said I was a Hobbyist! Please, show me where I said any different? Otherwise it’s just you talking.

    I’m a Gunsmith, Knifemaker, & Machinist…with ONE arm! What’s your SUPERPOWER?
    :)

    I think it’s a bit unrealistic WITHOUT very high cost machinery & tooling. Like several $100,000’s high cost.
    Implying that I am not knowledgeable enough to understand what I am talking about. You insult people all of the time and you act like a victim when you are called on it. We all have the ability to make ourselves look foolish.

    I watched you challenge the information I offered the OP. Then you ignorantly tried to make my response look stupid by chasing down specs on the internet. I again spoke truth. Now your trying to put it on me. I only responded to help you identify that you are not the Gunsmith or Machinist you claim to be. I am going to call you out as a fraud. I will give you credit when you deserve it but if you are going to bust my chops David, I will use facts to educate you and set the story straight. BS is not traction, it is the opposite. I have no agenda except to keep a bully in his place.
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    Duplicate

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Suburb of Filthadelphia.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,704
    You’re right. I worded that wrong. I wasn’t calling you out or implying you did not know anything. Wasn’t how I meant it. And for that Im sorry. But you very clearly did say those things about me, even insinuating Im lying.

    Ya know, when I lived in Tucson, I knew a guy who worked for Raytheon. If you showed what you do & called yourself a “Machinist” Robin, he would laugh & very firmly insist HE was a machinist, and you are a DIY’er. Just as he did to me. He was a despicable person. But what HE did, was his criteria for being a “machinist”. I didn’t agree with him. My first statement was wrong, not what I meant. My point was that .0002” is not easy. It’s not a starting point of accuracy; it’s the end game for most people. It’s what people strive for & it’s easy to find many, many very qualified people struggle with that type of accuracy. I can’t hold .0002”! Not even close. I can keep most things in about .0015” or so. Which is fine for my projects. But the way that guy in AZ would rebuke you (& most gunsmiths for that matter). People have their own criteria from things, I guess.

    Explain how my signature is stating I do it for a living? I don’t even make custom knives for a living. I just make them because it’s enjoyable. Or is that one of the things I have someone else do & lie about, as you so spitefully put it? (I changed the Sig just for you man.)

    In any case, I am sorry what I said sounded like it did. Not what I meant. Pretty sure I’ve ONLY said you are a better machinist than I’ll ever be. So, thanks for that.

  24. #24
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    las cruces, nm
    Posts
    2,729
    I routinely worked with people who held better than .0001" accuracy, and frequently not using super expensive equipment. Some of them were like that guy at Raytheon, since I worked for that company and the Tucson folks did work for me every now and then. They are people who do precision work on a daily basis. It is not what the run of the mill gunsmith does. But, a run of the mill gunsmith is not capable of building a true precision rifle. I've seen results from some of these 'professionals' and it ranges from horrible to barely adequate.

    I think Robin's first comment was just that. It takes a good gunsmith to do precision rifle work, ie, good enough to compete. And they will hold tolerances above the 'norm'. And, because of that knowledge and time, they cost accordingly.

  25. #25
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,811
    The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Savage 10 BA GRS 6.5mm Creedmoor
    By lucky.mcdonald13 in forum Other Firearm and Shooting Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-25-2017, 09:32 AM
  2. New Never Seen Before! Savage 10 fcp-Sr 6.5 Creedmoor
    By dawg4life in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-13-2016, 10:40 PM
  3. Savage 6.5 Creedmoor
    By pahoghunter in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 10-17-2015, 11:53 PM
  4. Savage 6.5 Creedmoor
    By wbm in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 10:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •