Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: "Acceptable" Scope Offset

  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    59

    "Acceptable" Scope Offset


    What is an acceptable difference in windage offset? I got 2 model 10's with after market bases installed, Seekins and Badger, where there is a considerable difference in offset to one side or the other. I've switched scopes, rings, turned the rings around, swapped bases back and forth between guns. And both guns still need to be cranked over considerably more to one side than the other. In opposite directions between guns though. Leaving me slightly less than 3 mils correction in one direction and 9+ mils in the other.

    Don't expect it to be equal, but, 3 times as much difference to one side seems excessive. Especially when only being left with less than 3 mils correction.

    After all the swapping, it would seem to me the screw holes for the bases are out of alignment. Or am I missing something?

  2. #2
    Basic Member Robinhood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    7,800
    did you buy the rifles new?

  3. #3
    Team Savage Stumpkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Port Crane, NY
    Age
    64
    Posts
    980
    I wouldn't be happy with that - but I will say I have a S.M.L.E. Mk IV* with a "existing screw hole" scope mount (aka "non-gunsmith scope mount") that puts the scope centerline 1/2" to the left of the bore. So I sighted it 1/2" left at 100 yards and aim a "hair" to the right.
    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance." Last words of Gen. Sedgwik

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    did you buy the rifles new?
    Yes.

    Both bases were also purchased "new".

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    55
    Easy fix, swap to "standard" turn-in bases and rings. Easy to center. Or go with the Millett "angle loc" scope rings that allow for windage adjustment. I typically center my crosshair then do my bore sighting windage adjustment using the bases.

    https://www.brownells.com/optics-mou...-prod9129.aspx


    Rosewood

  6. #6
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by rosewood View Post
    Easy fix, swap to "standard" turn-in bases and rings. Easy to center. Or go with the Millett "angle loc" scope rings that allow for windage adjustment. I typically center my crosshair then do my bore sighting windage adjustment using the bases.

    https://www.brownells.com/optics-mou...-prod9129.aspx


    Rosewood

    Want to keep using a 20-40 MOA base and need 34mm and/or 40mm rings.

    Thanks for the heads up.

  7. #7
    Basic Member BB68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    iowa
    Age
    45
    Posts
    257
    I have 1 12fv and 1 axis with the same problem. I am going to use leupold mounts to correct the problem, even though they choke off the port.

  8. #8
    Basic Member RustyShackle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    N.Ida
    Posts
    673
    I’ve read of some folks having issue with the Leupold mounts, however I haven’t. Maybe I’m lucky, the biggest complaint I can come up with is the partial blocking on the rear

  9. #9
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    799
    Get these Burris XTR Signature rings. Has inserts to correct your problem. I use these on my savage 338 LM FCP. Work great.
    https://www.burrisoptics.com/mountin...ignature-rings

  10. #10
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    157
    Quite disappointing that Savage still hasn't figured out how to drill and tap centered holes in the receiver. Most of my Savages have that problem and yet my WBY Vanguards and Tikka don't have those issues at all.

  11. #11
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Harpoon1 View Post
    Want to keep using a 20-40 MOA base and need 34mm and/or 40mm rings.

    Thanks for the heads up.
    I didn't realize you were using MOA bases. I don't think the turn-in are made with that ability (not sure it is geometrically possible). The ring inserts someone else mentioned sound like the answer you are looking for.

    Rosewood

  12. #12
    Team Savage GaCop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, Ga
    Age
    77
    Posts
    5,041
    Quote Originally Posted by rosewood View Post
    Easy fix, swap to "standard" turn-in bases and rings. Easy to center. Or go with the Millett "angle loc" scope rings that allow for windage adjustment. I typically center my crosshair then do my bore sighting windage adjustment using the bases.

    https://www.brownells.com/optics-mou...-prod9129.aspx




    Rosewood
    +1, windage adjustable rings will solve your problem.

Similar Threads

  1. Mark I/II/93R: Accidental find..."Display" Savage M93 FVXP/scope, box, papers, etc...$259
    By dogngun in forum Savage & Stevens Rimfire Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-31-2015, 08:25 AM
  2. Savage 99: Savage Model 99 Identification "B" "D" "F" or ???
    By dbates in forum Vintage Savage/Stevens/Fox Firearms
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-03-2015, 04:31 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-17-2014, 12:05 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2013, 09:07 PM
  5. Need opinions """ UPDATE SORT OF """
    By rjtfroggy in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-23-2012, 06:14 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •