Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?

  1. #1
    Pulp
    Guest

    Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?


    I've been using mostly H-380, H-414, and Varget in my Browning BAR .243. It's gotten to where it's been jamming lately, so I removed the bolt to clean the locking lugs. Turns out the whole bolt, grooves and receiver was contaminated with unburnt powder. I vaguely remember that the early problems with the M-16 were related to ball powder. So I'm wondering if they are just dirtier than stick powder.

    BTW it wasn't the crud that was causing my problem. Either I'm not setting the shoulder back far enough, or just above the rim isn't getting sized down enough, keeping the cartridge from seating all the way.

    The BAR is a fairly easy gun to take apart, and almost as easy to put back together. ;D The little operating handle on the bolt was the trickiest part.

  2. #2
    lostart
    Guest

    Re: Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?

    I dont know about 380 or varget, but 414 is diiirrrtttyy

  3. #3
    Eric in NC
    Guest

    Re: Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?

    I find them to generally be dirtier. Only one of my gas guns that gets much ball powder through it is the FAL with BL-C(2) but its adjustable gas system just lets you open it up more when it gets too dirty.

    Varget (stick powder) is generally pretty clean burning though...

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    133

    Re: Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?

    When you say "contaminated with unburnt powder," are you saying there were actual granules of powder in it? Stuff that looks just like what's in the powder can?

    I like 748 and 760 a lot, and shoot those powders a fair amount. What I can tell you is this: If you're loading with one of those two and getting _large_ amounts of soot, or actual unburned granules, then you're almost certainly running them at too low a pressure. Get them into their preferred pressure range (>50k psi, more or less, IME) and they clean up considerably. Even so, I do find them to leave somewhat more soot than some alternatives. That said, an advantage to them is that the carbon/soot is extremely soft and easy to remove, whereas some of the competition appears to burn squeaky clean, but in fact leaves diamond-hard carbon in the barrel that you don't necessarily even see until you bore-scope the gun trying to figure out what in the world has gone wrong with your barrel.

    I've heard that Ramshot TAC is quite clean, but I've not used it. I have used Hunter and Magnum, and they're good for cleanliness so far. Nevertheless, I still prefer 748, 760, and Supreme 780.

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SE Tennessee
    Posts
    609

    Re: Ball powders, are they dirtier than stick powder?

    The Ramshot powders are very clean. I have used X-Terminator, Tac, and Big Game and all are great. Clean burning compared to any other ball powders I have used.

Similar Threads

  1. New stick
    By tammons in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 10:49 AM
  2. Trigger job - go for evo or stick to factory?
    By Stockrex in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-16-2013, 10:50 PM
  3. New Stick - Sort of 338-06
    By tammons in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-15-2013, 02:22 PM
  4. Varget powder... is it "hotter " burning than most other powders?
    By kenbo776 in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 05:12 AM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •