.223 vs. 5.56/5.56 vs. .223 Re-chamber

[NoseWarmer]

I know that it has been hashed out about the differences between 5.56 and .223...

My question is this, what would one gain/loose by re-chambering a .223 to 5.56?

Gain; Larger availability to ammo...

Loss; Loss of accuracy shooting .223 in the 5.56 chamber?

Thoughts?

[m12lrs]

Looking for a compromise get the wilde chamber.

[sharpshooter]

If you are talking about a factory barrel, it already has a chamber that will handle 5.56.

[darkker]

I know that it has been hashed out about the differences between 5.56 and .223...

My question is this, what would one gain/loose by re-chambering a .223 to 5.56?

Gain; Larger availability to ammo...

Loss; Loss of accuracy shooting .223 in the 5.56 chamber?

Thoughts?

The difference is in the throat, or freebore if you prefer.

The problem with a "what's the difference" thread, is that no one sticks to the prints. There are about 6 different reamers all slightly different, that each company calls their "NATO" chamber. Likewise, I've only ever had over rifle that actually matched Remington's retarded original throat print to SAAMI.... That was a Remington. All of my other rifles have had something in between, and that was BEFORE some marketing jerkoff decided to whip up a frenzy about a "Wylde" chamber.

Personally, I've never found any accuracy loss with a 5.56 chamber. But great Scott you bleed off gas, and thus velocity!!

[m12lrs]

I have one 5.56 ar I use as a truck gun and that ever popular shtf gun.

I am not enamored with the .223/5.56. There are a whole lot of cartridges out there better. Sure wouldn't chamber a bolt gun with it.

[NoseWarmer]

If you are talking about a factory barrel, it already has a chamber that will handle 5.56.

So what you're saying is, most factory .223 rifles are already 5.56 capable...

[NoseWarmer]

The difference is in the throat, or freebore if you prefer.

The problem with a "what's the difference" thread, is that no one sticks to the prints. There are about 6 different reamers all slightly different, that each company calls their "NATO" chamber. Likewise, I've only ever had over rifle that actually matched Remington's retarded original throat print to SAAMI.... That was a Remington. All of my other rifles have had something in between, and that was BEFORE some marketing jerkoff decided to whip up a frenzy about a "Wylde" chamber.

Personally, I've never found any accuracy loss with a 5.56 chamber. But great Scott you bleed off gas, and thus velocity!!

Thanks for the insight...

[m12lrs]

So what you're saying is, most factory .223 rifles are already 5.56 capable...

Well I certainly would not say that.

Now is a .223 chambered rifle likely to blow up if a 5.56 is shot in it? Not likely.

Is it advisable? No!

There has been miles of print out there about this issue. Here is the best I have found

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/

[NoseWarmer]

Well I certainly would not say that.

Now is a .223 chambered rifle likely to blow up if a 5.56 is shot in it? Not likely.

Is it advisable? No!

There has been miles of print out there about this issue. Here is the best I have found

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/

SO... Nothing lost, nothing gained if a factory barrel was re-chambered in 5.56 other than the loss is some velocity and access to surplus ammo...

As for the article, I also have read it and understand it that's why this question was posed...

Thanks for all the reply's...

[sharpshooter]

All Savage barrels chambered in .223 have a minimum of .100 freebore, exceeding 5.56 specs. If you put a 5.56 reamer in the barrel and give it a twist, it will cut nothing....
Pay no attention to that luckygunner BS, as it is incomplete information and most does not apply. There is a difference between pages and pages of data, and the REAL world scenarios.

[NoseWarmer]

All Savage barrels chambered in .223 have a minimum of .100 freebore, exceeding 5.56 specs. If you put a 5.56 reamer in the barrel and give it a twist, it will cut nothing...

Thanks Sharpshooter...