Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 31 of 31

Thread: How to tell you have a 20 MOA base?

  1. #26
    Basic Member barrel-nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,067

    Quote Originally Posted by rovert View Post
    It's not quite that simple. In a perfect world it would be. If they are two piece bases I'm pretty certain they are not meant to be 20 MOA bases. I've never seen such a thing. It would be possible but I don't know that anyone offers them. The bases would definitely long action/short action specific and the front and back bases would have to be oriented properly.

    I doubt that is the case here. I see three possibilities. One is the action is quite far out of spec. Two is the bases are out of spec or are not the correct bases. Three is the rings are out of spec. As things are described I would lean towards the bases being incorrect. Something is misaligned pretty badly if the scope lifts off the front ring when placed squarely in the rear. Take the rings off and put a straight edge on the rear base. If it floats over the front it is not the rings. Take the bases off and put the straight edge on the action. If, when held tight to the rear screw tappings, it floats at the front screw tappings it is an action problem. If the action is straight it is a base problem.

    The action test assumes a round receiver. If this is a rear flat receiver I almost bet that the bases were not matched properly for the application. If you want to keep the 20 MOA two piece system that you have stumbled on to I would suggest Burris Signature rings. They should allow the scope to be secured without applying unwanted torque to the tube. You may be able to lap the rings to accomplish the same but it sounds like a lot.

    Best solution: get a real 20 MOA one piece base. (If the action is ok)
    Winner winner chicken dinner. Best answer by far.
    My guess would be that the action is out of spec. I've run into that before.
    To continue using the same bases, shim under the low one as yobuck suggested. Except use shims made for the job: http://www.midwayusa.com/product/154...-package-of-10
    Or switch to a one-piece rail. Which should be shimmed as well, to get proper contact, or bedded, or neither if you're in a hurry.

  2. #27
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,710
    Thanks for all the responses, guys. Really learned a lot about scopes, bases , rings and alignment, and appreciate you sharing your experiences and wisdom.

    The scope on my Savage shoots great, despite the irregularities. Got plenty of up adjustment for 750 yard shooting, and may even go for 1000 some day, but apparently it is all an accident. Nevertheless, it works. I will continue to plan on getting a 20 moa one piece base and some better rings soon, if for no other reason than to have a reliable set up that i can move to another gun if necessary.

    Thanks again.

  3. #28
    Basic Member bajeep93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by rovert View Post
    It's not quite that simple. In a perfect world it would be. If they are two piece bases I'm pretty certain they are not meant to be 20 MOA bases. I've never seen such a thing. It would be possible but I don't know that anyone offers them. The bases would definitely long action/short action specific and the front and back bases would have to be oriented properly.

    I doubt that is the case here. I see three possibilities. One is the action is quite far out of spec. Two is the bases are out of spec or are not the correct bases. Three is the rings are out of spec. As things are described I would lean towards the bases being incorrect. Something is misaligned pretty badly if the scope lifts off the front ring when placed squarely in the rear. Take the rings off and put a straight edge on the rear base. If it floats over the front it is not the rings. Take the bases off and put the straight edge on the action. If, when held tight to the rear screw tappings, it floats at the front screw tappings it is an action problem. If the action is straight it is a base problem.

    The action test assumes a round receiver. If this is a rear flat receiver I almost bet that the bases were not matched properly for the application. If you want to keep the 20 MOA two piece system that you have stumbled on to I would suggest Burris Signature rings. They should allow the scope to be secured without applying unwanted torque to the tube. You may be able to lap the rings to accomplish the same but it sounds like a lot.

    Best solution: get a real 20 MOA one piece base. (If the action is ok)
    Now you have seen it
    https://www.midwayusa.com/product/59...ear-axis-matte

  4. #29
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,248
    ^ that product has been discontinued by Midway. ^

    The same 20 MOA 2 piece bases cannot work on both a long and short action. That Geometry does not work. Maybe Midway should have listed an option for both the long and short actions. Or maybe they didn't sell because of the $86 price tag, which is ridiculous, even for Night Force.

    But I think the mix up on this product listing is with Midway, not Night Force ?

    "T 10" you now know all you could ever know about a problem you don't have! :-) As you said, your rifle shoots well. But if you still want to perfect away the issues you may have, you've answered those questions also. Go with a one piece base, or the Burris Zee rings. :-) The Brotherhood always comes through! :-)
    Last edited by FW Conch; 02-19-2016 at 05:29 AM.

  5. #30
    pitsnipe
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Russmerle View Post
    If she is FUBAR'd I'd say she's FUBAR'd in the right direction

    +1 on that



    Snipe

  6. #31
    Basic Member barrel-nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Texas10 View Post
    Thanks for all the responses, guys. Really learned a lot about scopes, bases , rings and alignment, and appreciate you sharing your experiences and wisdom.

    The scope on my Savage shoots great, despite the irregularities. Got plenty of up adjustment for 750 yard shooting, and may even go for 1000 some day, but apparently it is all an accident. Nevertheless, it works. I will continue to plan on getting a 20 moa one piece base and some better rings soon, if for no other reason than to have a reliable set up that i can move to another gun if necessary.

    Thanks again.
    Never meant to imply that it's an "accident". It simply is what it is. Sounds like the only problem that you have with your setup, is that your bases are not on the same plane with each other, which is hard on your scope tube when tightened down. I would suggest trying to correct that situation before installing any scope that you value very highly, because it may well cause damage. There are several routes to do this, many have already been mentioned. Just be aware that fixing this problem may actually cause you to have less elevation available than you do now. Up to you to decide if you want to leave it as-is or try to level out your rings.
    The Burris rings with inserts mentioned above are another good option if you decide to mess with it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. 1 pc base
    By rs in forum Axis Series Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-13-2015, 06:14 PM
  2. Base
    By budmccarroll in forum Optics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2015, 01:27 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-20-2012, 08:40 AM
  4. Do i need a moa base
    By fabricator21 in forum Optics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-31-2011, 09:40 AM
  5. EGW standard base vs the HD base
    By efm77 in forum Optics
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-04-2011, 04:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •