Reply With Quote
I would be cautious of dealing with cheaper than dirt. They have had issues in the past with delivering the goods they advertise.
BTW, Midsouth Shooters Supply beats that price by $10
http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.co...?sku=001256310
As for bases and rings,
I would not consider the stock weaver bases to be ideal, but they will work. If you can afford to upgrade, now would be the best time, before you get it all together and sighted in. Personal preference has a lot to do with these things, so you'll get as many different answers as people you ask. I prefer the Burris dual dovetail mounts and signature rings on my hunting rifles, and the Warne bases and Maxima rings on my target rifles. That doesn't mean that other configurations wouldn't work just as well, but it's what I prefer.
The ring height goes directly towards scope clearance to the barrel. If you're using a scope with a 40mm objective diameter (that's the front lense bell), then a medium height ring should clear your barrel with no problems. If you go up to a larger diameter scope, you will probably need to change the rings to a higher ring as well.
EDIT--
Oh, I forgot to mention, I have the Nikon buckmaster scope on my coyote rifle, and it's been great. Very rugged and has put up with a lot of abuse. I would not consider it a long range scope, but calling coyotes, my longest shot will be under 300 yards, and that's plenty of scope quality and power for that use.
AGAIN--
I have the same Pro Staff scope on my 17 Remington Contender carbine. It's a good scope for the money. Don't let anyone tell you the Nikon's aren't good. They put up with a lot of abuse, and even my Pro Staff scope is clear and repeatable.
Bookmarks