Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: .223 Hog Hunter Irons shooting WAY high at lowest position?

  1. #1
    Hobbez
    Guest

    .223 Hog Hunter Irons shooting WAY high at lowest position?


    Hey All,

    I've been searching the web for an answer to this but haven't found anything so I'm wondering if it's just me...

    I picked up the Hog Huner 11 in .223 because I wanted a .223 with open sights in the $500 range and it fit the bill. Problem is, I went to sight it in at 50 yards and even with the rear blade at it's lowest setting I'm hitting a good 5 inches high with 55 grain bullets. I can make this work with a 6 o'clock hold but I would much prefer to be shooting a dead hold. Am I missing something here or should I look into a lower rear blade? My secondary concern is that if a new blade is too low, the comb height of the stock will make it difficult to aim because of the tall front post. I don't understand why savage would be shipping a gun with sights that don't make sense and am hoping that someone here might be able to help me figure this one out.

    Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    2,879
    Is the front blade adjustable?

  3. #3
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    149
    The front blade isn't adjustable on mine so I would assume it would be the same on his. Are you sure your aligning the sights correctly? I haven't shot mine yet so I can't comment if mine shoots the same.

  4. #4
    the Ranger
    Guest
    I would look at putting a taller front sight on rather than a lower rear. like you said, the lower rear could be difficult get aligned on.

  5. #5
    JCalhoun
    Guest
    It was also a problem with the one I reviewed.

  6. #6
    Administrator J.Baker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NW Ohio
    Age
    49
    Posts
    6,468
    Probably going to have to get a taller front sight blade. IIRC Savage uses Williams sights.
    "Life' is tough. It's even tougher if you're stupid." ~ John Wayne
    “Under certain circumstances, 
urgent circumstances, desperate circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer.” —Mark Twain

  7. #7
    JCalhoun
    Guest
    Correct. The 11HH I had used Williams sights.

    I had thought about doing a flip up rear sight on a Picatinny scope rail but traded it before I could look into that.

  8. #8
    Hobbez
    Guest
    I suppose you could push it left or right for windage but there is no up/down adjustment on the front post which is already stinking high as it is...

    I picked up a new rear blade today to try out that's about 3/16" high and as guessed, it's way too low to get a good picture. If I am correct in measuring the stock blade at 1/2", I believe something in the neighborhood of 1/4" or 5/16" might do the trick.

    There's stuff on midwayusa but I'm in Canada... anyone know of a good site that deals in williams parts up here?

  9. #9
    Hobbez
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by boostless View Post
    The front blade isn't adjustable on mine so I would assume it would be the same on his. Are you sure your aligning the sights correctly? I haven't shot mine yet so I can't comment if mine shoots the same.
    Pretty sure - the front post goes in the "U" notch...

  10. #10
    Hobbez
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by the Ranger View Post
    I would look at putting a taller front sight on rather than a lower rear. like you said, the lower rear could be difficult get aligned on.
    I'll keep this in mind as a last resort... it's already pretty stinkin high...

  11. #11
    Hobbez
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by JCalhoun View Post
    Correct. The 11HH I had used Williams sights.

    I had thought about doing a flip up rear sight on a Picatinny scope rail but traded it before I could look into that.
    Not a bad idea, but I am putting quick release scope mounts on. I like to hunt with glass and cut paper with iron.

  12. #12
    claysshotgunner
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbez View Post
    Problem is, I went to sight it in at 50 yards and even with the rear blade at it's lowest setting I'm hitting a good 5 inches high with 55 grain bullets. I can make this work with a 6 o'clock hold but I would much prefer to be shooting a dead hold.
    !
    So, you are wanting a dead on hold at 50 Yards? I did not look at any trajectory charts, but that seems a little close to zero dead on.

  13. #13
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by claysshotgunner View Post
    So, you are wanting a dead on hold at 50 Yards? I did not look at any trajectory charts, but that seems a little close to zero dead on.
    Well he did say it was shooting about 6" high at 50. I would be ok with about 2" high at 100 for a zero with irons. If we have Irons on military 223 rifles we do a BZO(Battle Sight Zero) at 36yds which equates to about 300yds based on the arch the bullet travels.

    I wouldn't be happy with 6" high at 50 either.

  14. #14
    Hobbez
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneWolf View Post
    Well he did say it was shooting about 6" high at 50. I would be ok with about 2" high at 100 for a zero with irons. If we have Irons on military 223 rifles we do a BZO(Battle Sight Zero) at 36yds which equates to about 300yds based on the arch the bullet travels.

    I wouldn't be happy with 6" high at 50 either.
    After checking my ballistics, I should really be aiming to sight in at 30 yards for a 200 yard zero. Seems to be the flattest trajectory for a max of 300 yards. None the less, it seems that the sights are the issue. I'm going to try and find a shorter rear blade from a local gunsmith tomorrow... wish me luck!

  15. #15
    JCalhoun
    Guest
    I never could the factory installed sight to hit center at 50 or 100 yards and they were not even in the ballpark.

  16. #16
    Hobbez
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by JCalhoun View Post
    I never could the factory installed sight to hit center at 50 or 100 yards and they were not even in the ballpark.
    Seeing as I'm not the only one, I wonder if a call to Savage might yield some results (or perhaps a new rear blade!). After thinking some more, I'm wondering if the sights are meant for the heavier .308 bullets but weren't tested for light .223 loads...

Similar Threads

  1. Savage 99: Shooting to high
    By ltmlt in forum Vintage Savage/Stevens/Fox Firearms
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-09-2018, 08:11 AM
  2. Stevens 320: Issues with Stevens 320 shooting high
    By mnrobitaille in forum Savage & Stevens Shotguns
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-01-2018, 03:43 PM
  3. Savage Hog Hunter iron sights ....shooting too high
    By david7x64 in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-26-2015, 05:36 AM
  4. High cost of shooting, what are you doing?
    By finebead in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 12-29-2013, 07:46 PM
  5. hog hunter 223 shooting high
    By scubadad in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-05-2013, 03:29 PM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •