Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Vortex Viper HS-T 4-16x44 or Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x50 AO MC

  1. #1
    Basic Member ShowMeShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    107

    Vortex Viper HS-T 4-16x44 or Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x50 AO MC


    I've been looking into these two scopes, for my .270 to shoot 400-500 yards max for now. Can someone shine some light on these two rigs in repeatability of the turrets and glass clarity comparison? Both are very close in price. I plan to shoot varmints, deer and work my way out to longer effective range as my ability allows. Right now this rifle doesn't have a scope on it. So I'm trying to get it back up and running, without breaking the bank or rushing into a bad buy.

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    traverse city,michigan
    Age
    46
    Posts
    701
    I've been pretty happy with my HS-T. I've never owned a Zeiss or used one so I can't compare the two.
    I'm debating about an swfa ss 3-15x42 for my next scope. People say the glass is much better.

  3. #3
    buxman66
    Guest
    I'm also looking @ the same vortex scope/power, and always looking for pros/cons of it.

  4. #4
    Basic Member shoalwater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    165

    Vortex Viper HS-T 4-16x44 or Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x50 AO MC

    I doubt the SWFA glass is any better as it is not the HD glass they use in the 5-20, but can't say for sure as I have not looked through the 3-15, plus it is about $150 more than the others, probably due to it being FFP. I do however have a Razor HD 5-20 and a SWFA HD 5-20 and to my eye the razor has a little better glass. I am a Vortex fan and the HS-T in 4-16 is what I am putting on my long range hunting rifle in 284 Win that I am currently building. I don't have experience with the exact Zeiss that the op is talking about, but the Conquest line of scopes does have good glass for the money. I think you would be happy either way you go, probably more features with the Vortex and probably a little better glass with the Zeiss.

  5. #5
    The Ghost
    Guest
    I have the Vortex Viper PST 6-24 FFP on a 308 and viper 1-4 on an AR. Both are very clear, positive clicks, and have a great warranty. I'm real happy with my vortex. The 270 no doubt will make most scopes appear better than they are. Good luck with what ever you pick!

  6. #6
    Basic Member BoilerUP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Floyd Co, IN
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,100
    I've got two HST 4-16x...they aren't HDMRs but they are very nice for the money. Shot them to 1100, haven't felt underscoped.

    Not sure how it compares optically with the FFP SWFA 3-15x or a Zeiss.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-10-2016, 09:51 PM
  2. Zeiss Conquest
    By ColColt in forum Optics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-11-2014, 10:31 PM
  3. Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40
    By Smokey262 in forum Optics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-23-2011, 01:29 PM
  4. Vortex viper 6.5-20x50 PA vs Viper 6-24x50 PST
    By GA-SURVEYOR in forum Optics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-14-2011, 07:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •