Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Long action "rail" and rings????

  1. #1
    treeworkplus
    Guest

    Long action "rail" and rings????


    Any suggestions on a low combination for my older long action Savage build in 22-250? I purchased an EGW picatinny rail and "low" rings but the combination was too high with my 6-24X44 Hawke scope. The EGW rail is taller than most. Lots of options for short actions but I'm unable to find a low "rail" for my long action.

    Thanks for any info
    Mike

  2. #2
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Hot Springs, SD
    Age
    59
    Posts
    246
    My first thought is to raise the cheek placement. Using a cheek pad or the like. Someone else may have a different fix, but that's my first thought.

  3. #3
    pitsnipe
    Guest
    I concur with Jack. Try to get the scope as low as possible with base and rings (within 1/4" of the barrel) Then just raise the cheek rest with a Karstens or slip on. You wont regret the solid cheek placement. Most stocks are not made with a high enough comb for proper cheek weld even WITH the lowest scope placement anyway.
    Good luck.

  4. #4
    treeworkplus
    Guest
    A good suggestion I use on my model 16 Weather Warrior 22-250 coyote gun. My scope is very close to the barrel and I still had to shape a piece of wood, duct tape it to the accustock and slide one of those $8 elastic butt stock bullet holders over it. Looks great and perfect cheek weld!
    I'm trying to mount the scope as low as possible on a 308 to 22-250 build. Using the "Point Blank" ballistic program, one of the inputs is scope height above bore. The lower the scope, the longer the distance before hold over/under is needed. We use dogs to run the coyotes here in Northern Michigan and shots are always at unknown distances.

    Thanks for the good suggestions!
    Mike

  5. #5
    Basic Member geargrinder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,727
    The Weaver Tacticals are shorter than the EGW's. Cheaper too.
    "Muzzle velocity is a depreciating asset, not unlike a new car, but BC, like diamonds, is forever."-German A. Salazar

  6. #6
    treeworkplus
    Guest
    Thanks for the Weaver suggestion. I checked and can't find them for my flat rear version. I looked at your pictures closer and notice yours is a round rear receiver.

    Mike

Similar Threads

  1. Vortex Rings "Bottoming out" on scope.
    By lrshooting in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-16-2015, 09:45 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-17-2014, 12:05 PM
  3. EGW "practical" Rings (30mm), EGW 0 MOA Base, Mounting Issues
    By Silvercrow1 in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-08-2014, 03:35 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 11:05 AM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •