Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35

Thread: The right Bullet for .308 Criterion barrel

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    loneranger04
    Guest

    The right Bullet for .308 Criterion barrel

    Hey everyone. I'm new to the forum and want to first off say "thanks" for letting me join up. I've been a shooter for 40 plus years (telling my age) and currently shoot a lot of 3 gun and IDPA however have started shooting some long range matches with my recently purchased .308 and am needing some direction for reloading.

    My rifle is a Savage action with a 24" bull Criterion barrel set in a Manners stock. The barrel has a 1:10 twist and I've tried several different bullets and am seeing pretty average groups (.8-1 inch range with 1" being the norm) with everything I've shot. I'm currently using SMK 175s seated .02 off the lands with 44.3gr Varget and CCI BR2s and Lapua brass. I've tried 178 gr. Hornady Amax and Nosler 168 gr competion bullets with about identical results. I'm going to be using the rifle on some long range matches with ranges starting at 300yds and going out to 1400 yds so I'd like to see some tighter groups if at all possible. My question is...has anyone here had better results with these barrels shooting heavier bullets, such as Berger 185s, or maybe lighter bullets, such as SMK 155 Palmas? The twist should shoot these 175s better than the light bullets I would think but just not seeing what I had hoped with the 175 SMKS. Hate to keep buying different bullets trying to find that "just right bullet". Hoping someone here can shed some light. Thanks.

  2. #2
    acemisser
    Guest
    I am shooting the 175 SMK's out of my Remington 700 with the 1 in 10 twist barrel...I have gotten some
    pretty good results out to 250 in the F class matchs here..I have found that Reloader 15 is the best
    powder in my rifle and I am using Federal Mag.primers and Winchester brass.The bullets jump into
    the lands..My charge weight is 43.0 grains..In some manuals that is listed as over max...
    I wouls continue to use it for the shoots but it only has a sporter weight barrel and gets very hot in
    short order..Maybe this winter I will have it rebarrel with a bull barrel....

    And like yourself I would like to shoot the 155 Lapua's but they will not shot accurate with the twist..
    My thought on it is to stick with the heavy bullets for better performance in the wind..Good luck
    with your shooting..John

  3. #3
    helotaxi
    Guest
    Twist only tells what the barrel can stabilize, not what bullets it will shoot best.



    That is a 5-shot group of 168gn SMKs fired from a 1:10 barrel. It was the best group of the day for sure, but the worst was still under 3/4 MOA. That barrel does not shoot 175 SMKs as well. It shoots 155gn Custom Comps better than the 175 SMKs, in fact holding just over .5 MOA @ 300yds.

    If your rifle is not shooting a bullet well, it's either because the barrel "doesn't like that bullet" or you haven't found a load combination that it does like with that bullet. Barrel rate of twist isn't the issue. If you're assuming that the rifle won't shoot well with the 155gn bullets because of the twist...well you know what they say about assuming. I don't have my "definitive" reference handy, but if IIRC the Lapua 155gn Scenar is longer than the 168 SMK. Since bullet length, not weight, is what determines required rate of twist for stability, the idea that a (relatively) fast twist barrel would not shoot the longer bullet as accurately doesn't stand up to basic sanity, if rate of twist were the issue, like you assume...which it isn't.

  4. #4
    acemisser
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by helotaxi View Post
    Twist only tells what the barrel can stabilize, not what bullets it will shoot best.



    That is a 5-shot group of 168gn SMKs fired from a 1:10 barrel. It was the best group of the day for sure, but the worst was still under 3/4 MOA. That barrel does not shoot 175 SMKs as well. It shoots 155gn Custom Comps better than the 175 SMKs, in fact holding just over .5 MOA @ 300yds.

    If your rifle is not shooting a bullet well, it's either because the barrel "doesn't like that bullet" or you haven't found a load combination that it does like with that bullet. Barrel rate of twist isn't the issue. If you're assuming that the rifle won't shoot well with the 155gn bullets because of the twist...well you know what they say about assuming. I don't have my "definitive" reference handy, but if IIRC the Lapua 155gn Scenar is longer than the 168 SMK. Since bullet length, not weight, is what determines required rate of twist for stability, the idea that a (relatively) fast twist barrel would not shoot the longer bullet as accurately doesn't stand up to basic sanity, if rate of twist were the issue, like you assume...which it isn't.
    Guess I will never get it then..I tried Hornady 168 gr. match bullets in this barrel,with no luck at all..I think the best was like 1 1/4 at 100 yrd....I tried several powders and different oal.as well...It just would not shoot with any more accuracy..I guess that is why I have trouble when people like you say the twist makes no difference..I know some rifle's just seem to like every load combo available..
    But like I said,it just does not work for me..Now maybe that is the issue,the length of the bullet its self..I have never tried the 155 lapua's...I just hate to buy a box and not have them work..It would be outstanding if they did though....John

  5. #5
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    489
    [QUOTE
    But like I said,it just does not work for me..Now maybe that is the issue,the length of the bullet its self..I have never tried the 155 lapua's...I just hate to buy a box and not have them work..It would be outstanding if they did though....John[/QUOTE]

    You can buy a few bullets to try from bulletsamples.com; also seems like I read Brownells sells sample quantities. With 10 or so you should be able to tell if a new bullet has good potential or not.

  6. #6
    loneranger04
    Guest
    Yep, you're right. It's the faster twist likes the longer bullets, not heavier. Thanks.
    I can't go too long because of magazine length. Wish I could buy a dozen bullets instead of a whole box.

  7. #7
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    157
    Ditto on the SMK. My 10 BA is around .5 MOA at 400 yards on a good day using either Black Hills 168 or 175g SMK.

    Hornady for some reason have not been as good as BHA in my rifle.

  8. #8
    loneranger04
    Guest
    Twist is one of those things that cause a rifle to shoot well with one bullet and not so well with another. I'm with you, acemisser, I hate to buy another box of bullets only to see that I'm no better off than my 175 SMKs that cost $10-!5 more than SMKs. But helotaxi is right in that the faster twist like longer bullets...usually. I shot black powder for years and usually you used a 1:66 barrel for round ball and a 1:24 or so for conical and sabots. I guess the real answer to my question, which is which bullet will shoot better, can only be answered by buying more bullets and working up more loads. Oh well, it's fun to play anyway. Just getting a little expensive.

    Thanks to all the replies.

  9. #9
    Basic Member Jamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rapid City, SD
    Age
    53
    Posts
    667
    Twist only stabilizes a bullet, it doesn't dictate accuracy. Now the argument can be stated that if a bullet is not not stable then it cannot be accurate. That is true but we are past that here. Just because a rifle has a fast twist does NOT mean it will shoot heavy bullets accurately. It just means they will make round holes in the targets when they hit instead of key-holing.

    I have a RRA in .223 with 1:8 twist. It will stabilize 75 grain Amaxes all day but will shoot them into a 1.5" group. On the other hand it will put 5, 52 grain NBTs into less than .5"

    The barrel will tell you what it likes, not the twist rate and some barrels are picky and takes some work to find the sweet spot.

  10. #10
    Team Savage wbm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    New Mexico
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,660
    Having shot the 175 Sierra in both M1A and bolt guns I would opt for a powder other than Varget. I know lot's of shooters have had great success with Varget but I never got it to shoot better than some other powders in the .308. Personally I would work with IMR4064 with the 175 match king. The latest military ammunition for long range, M118LR, uses 41.7g of IMR4064 with the 175g SMK. I would start there.

  11. #11
    acemisser
    Guest
    all well and good for some barrels...I do not agree with some of the stuff written..I have to prove it to myself..

    I had one fellow tell me he was shooting 110 gr. bullets in a 1 in 10 twist with great accuracy....come to find out
    he was talking about hitting a pie plate at 100 yards..lol Anyway,I guess I am gonna have to order a box of the
    155 lapua and find out for myself..I appreciate all the comments and replies...John

    For what its worth Lupua reccomends a 1 in 12 for their 1555 grain match bullets....So i'm staying with the 175 SMK or a bit heavier.....Honest Ingiun...
    Last edited by acemisser; 10-26-2012 at 01:52 PM.

  12. #12
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    95
    My CBI 30" 1-11 loves Berger 185 BTTLR (30418) bullets with either Varget or RL-17. Defiantly shoots tighter with these than my Sierra 175 Match Kings
    6CM

  13. #13
    Hooker
    Guest
    Try 43 grains of RL 15 with 175s. 155 Sierra Palmas shot well out of my barrel also.

  14. #14
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    74
    Posts
    161
    Do not seat bullets .02 from the lands. That's too close, and tolerances being imperfect, you will likely get some rounds touching and some rounds off the lands. Set back 0.010" and try again. Also, no matter what kind of stock you have, it may need to be bedded. I have the McMillan 10FP, and it shot right at 0.9" for 5 shot groups until it was bedded; then it shot 0.38" with the same ammo. Depending on what makes contact, if there are aluminum bedding blocks in your stock, you can use J-B Weld to put some on each block, of course with release agent. Too much diddling with various bullets will make you crazy! The SMK will do fine; Noslers ditto; Bergers jump just fine (I've shot under 0.3" with Bergers jumping 0.25"). Also, break-ins vary, and if you do these things, and don't get under 0.5", get the Tubb Fire-lapping system, called Final Finish.
    Jim

  15. #15
    Basic Member rjtfroggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ct.
    Age
    72
    Posts
    1,621
    !55 smk's pushed by 42.6 gr. IMR 4895 out of a 1:10 cbi 26" after playing a little with the seating and settling at 0.018 off the lands gave me .335 5 shot groups at 100 and opened up to.645at 200.
    You will only find out after you try.
    FROGGY
    See profile for fire arms
    Do it today there maybe no tomorrow

  16. #16
    stangfish
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jim_k View Post
    Do not seat bullets .02 from the lands. That's too close, and tolerances being imperfect, you will likely get some rounds touching and some rounds off the lands. Set back 0.010" and try again. Also, no matter what kind of stock you have, it may need to be bedded. I have the McMillan 10FP, and it shot right at 0.9" for 5 shot groups until it was bedded; then it shot 0.38" with the same ammo. Depending on what makes contact, if there are aluminum bedding blocks in your stock, you can use J-B Weld to put some on each block, of course with release agent. Too much diddling with various bullets will make you crazy! The SMK will do fine; Noslers ditto; Bergers jump just fine (I've shot under 0.3" with Bergers jumping 0.25"). Also, break-ins vary, and if you do these things, and don't get under 0.5", get the Tubb Fire-lapping system, called Final Finish.
    Jim
    Im not sure what to think about this. Dont seat them .020 off the lands because some will touch and some will be off. Last time I checked if they are .020 off the lands then they are not touching the lands they are .020 off the lands. Im thinking that they are not .040 off the lands because they are .020 off the lands.You may be much more knowledgeable than I but that statement does not have reason to me unless you are not aware that COAL and the ogive are different distances or possibly we are not experienced enough to know this. Im not looking for an arguement but many people put bergers in the lands on a stadard chamber with great results.
    I am but a 580 F/TR shooter doing it with 155's CC's in a CBI 10T 28". Almost everyone that beats me has a berger.... in the lands.

  17. #17
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    74
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by stangfish View Post
    Im not sure what to think about this. Dont seat them .020 off the lands because some will touch and some will be off. Last time I checked if they are .020 off the lands then they are not touching the lands they are .020 off the lands. Im thinking that they are not .040 off the lands because they are .020 off the lands.You may be much more knowledgeable than I but that statement does not have reason to me unless you are not aware that COAL and the ogive are different distances or possibly we are not experienced enough to know this. Im not looking for an arguement but many people put bergers in the lands on a stadard chamber with great results.
    I am but a 580 F/TR shooter doing it with 155's CC's in a CBI 10T 28". Almost everyone that beats me has a berger.... in the lands.
    You are right about the seating depth. I misinterpreted 0.02" as 0.002", and you should not seat "barely off" the lands, for the reason I stated. Either shorter OAL or into the lands. I agree that [U]usually[U] the rifle will shoot better jammed into the lands, and I don't think there's anywhere near the "high-pressure" risk that people typically caution about. I have quit seating into the lands, since my aiming error is always more than any advantage I could see on the target.
    Thanks for correcting my error. Those Berger-shootin' F/TR folks also obsess about bullet pointers and meplat uniformity, and I don't blame you if you don't do those things.
    Jim

  18. #18
    stangfish
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jim_k View Post
    Those Berger-shootin' F/TR folks also obsess about bullet pointers and meplat uniformity, and I don't blame you if you don't do those things.
    Jim
    He he...obsession is relative!

  19. #19
    Super Moderator Blue Avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,965
    Quote Originally Posted by jim_k View Post
    Do not seat bullets .02 from the lands. That's too close, and tolerances being imperfect, you will likely get some rounds touching and some rounds off the lands. Set back 0.010" and try again.
    Jim
    while were at it, my poor learning shows .010 is closer then .020 or are you now wanting .030? another confused person.
    .223 Rem AI, .22-250 AI, .220 Swift AI .243 Win AI, .6mm Rem AI, .257 Rob AI, .25-06 AI, 6.5x300wsm .30-06 AI, .270 STW, 7mm STW, 28 nosler, .416 Taylor

  20. 10-26-2012, 08:54 PM

  21. #21
    loneranger04
    Guest
    I'm actually seating bullets using the ogive as a measurement, instead of the COL. Bullet tips are not very uniform so COLs aren't all that meaningful, except considering length of magazine. I'm shooting long distances and would prefer the 175s over the 155s however I think my next bullet will be the Berger 185s BTTLRs because of the BCs and long range shooting. Unfortunately my home range will only support shooting 200 yds and I won't know how any of them perform out to over 1000 yards until I shoot a match.

    Thanks for all the info.

  22. #22
    loneranger04
    Guest
    Thanks Charlie! Didn't know that. Just looked and that's what I'll be trying. That's what I love about these forums. Tons on useful information.

  23. #23
    FUBAR
    Guest
    No one can take this overall subject and condense it to a single category.

    It not just "one thing"; jumping or jamming, long vs short bullet, heavy vs light, plus no one mentioned long vs short freebore, or slow vs long burning powder, and I can't recall if long vs short barrel length, or the number of groves in the barrel, etc.....

    It's all of the above: All things being equal, you can't have a long bullet without weight--now before someone jumps off their horse, I did say all things being equal--each type of bullet is different but in the formula(s) for design weight cannot be dismissed: http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles...et_weights.htm

    Therefore the velocity, bullet design, seating depth, barrel length, powder burn rate, freebore, neck tension, and case design (is there room for the correct powder/bullet combo) etc.... All have to be taken as a whole to predict how a particular bullet will act, in a particular twist rate....

    JBM has a great calculator, it enhances ones ability to calculate the outcome in principle and in practice

    http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles...et_weights.htm

  24. #24
    loneranger04
    Guest
    Thanks Fubar. I"ve been using the JBM calculator to figure what bullet will work. I loaded some Nosler 168 gr. Competition with 45.0 gr of Varget yesterday to use to foul my barrel before shooting a group and just for kicks and grins I shot a couple of groups that were under 1/2". Unfortunately I don't think that bullet will be traveling fast enough past 1000 yards to stay stable. Most of they shooters I'm shooting with are using the 175 gr SMKs because of the BCs. Best those bullets do from my rifle is .8" and ususally I'm closer to 1". Probably good enough but I'd like to stay closer to 1/2". Teele is using the 185 gr. Berger long range BTs and I've ordered some of them from bulletsample.com and I'm hoping that they will shoot good and I can seat them short enough to load them into my magazine. What I may do is shoot the Nosler Competion bullets out to 900 yards and then switch to the Berger or SMKs. I'm also going to try the SMK 155 gr Palma. They have a really good BC also.
    It's all part of the game. It's frustrating sometimes when the load you think should shoot doesn't however it's a lot of fun when you finally figure it all out and you see that nice cluster on the target.

  25. #25
    FUBAR
    Guest
    Loneranger04:

    I'm sure you'er better at shooting tiny groups at 1000 yards than I, as long as I can hit in my target radius I'm happy...

    In other words I'm more interested in accuracy than precision

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Criterion 260 Barrel
    By Billy in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-27-2015, 04:52 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-27-2013, 09:49 AM
  3. bullet preference for Criterion barel in .223
    By jhelmuth in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-22-2012, 10:51 PM

Members who have read this thread in the last 1 days: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •