Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Stevens .223 review

  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Stevens .223 review


    I got a stevens .223 a few weeks ago. Before I ever shot it, I removed the trigger, bedded the action, reinforced the stock with two steel rods and devcon, and duracoated the action, barrel, and stock. Getting the trigger back on turned out to be a little harder than expected but I did manage ( will not try again). Also if you bed one, the action sets higher and you have to adjust the box magazine so it feeds properly. I finallly got it assembled over the weekend and took it out with a few handloads. I used 69gr matc kings and 25, 25.5, and 26.0 grains of Varget. I seated five shots at book max COAL and then five at .015 off lands for each powder charge. The first group came in just shy of .5 inches and clocked in at 2880 fps. I couldn't believe it because none of my guns shoot that well. Next, I shot the 25.0 group loaded to .015 off lands. To my disbelief the group measured .27 inches with an average speed of 2940. The 25.5, and 26.0 groups both were over 1" so they were ruled out. I loaded up 20 rounds and went back out and shot another group around .25". I moved back to 400, adjusted my scope up 7 moa, and fired three rounds on my steel target.

    TO SAY THAT I AM HAPPY WITH MY SUB 300 DOLLAR STEVENS WOULD BE AN UNDERSTATEMENT.

  2. #2
    r29l20
    Guest

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    Gotta love them rifles. :)

  3. #3
    wigoschnig
    Guest

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    Hi,
    I am gong to try to reinforce my composite Savage stock as you did. Can you tell me how rigid you believe your forearm now is? Can you give me a step by step procedure that you followed? Also, how did you specifically adjust your magazine for the increased height of your receiver? Did you fill the forearms nooks and crannies? How much heavier is you rifle now?

    Best regards, John

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    I got one 5/16" steel rod and cut it to fit the stock. I dremmeled out the stock down the edge on either side for the rods to set in. Where the sling stud comes up, I had to grind the rod down to fit around it so the rod would go to the forend. After getting the rods set, I sanded the smooth inside of the stock down with the dremmel. I then applied jb weld over the rods and smoothed it out as best I could. After that dried, I bedded the action with Devcon. I have a centerfeed magazine that stays in the stock so I took it out. The magazine has a metal clip on the rear side of it that sets over the rear action screw. After bedding, this clip will not fit. Here is where the real technical engineering comes in. I cut the off top part of the clip ( right in the bend) with a dremmel. The magazine fit, but would not cyle ammo because without the clip, it set too far down in the stock. I then got sand paper and cut it out to the shape of the bottom of the clip and set layers of the sandpaper in the bottom of the stock until the clip was high enough and would cycle ammo. The clip is actually a hair to high rigt now and will catch the ammo after it is fired causin it not to eject. All I need to do is remove one layer of sandpaper to get it just a little lower where the ejecting brass will not catch the tip of the clip after fireing. Hope this helps. You can find details on how to bed a Savage on snipershide gunsmithing section, it is a sticky on the top of the page. I found a link on this site that described how to cut the metal clip on the stock after bedding. The sandpaper was all my idea ;D. The gun is not heavy enough now and I plan on adding some lead bass weights and expanding foam in the but stock.

  5. #5
    Basic Member GaCop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, Ga
    Age
    77
    Posts
    5,020

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    Excellent work and ingenuity!
    Vietnam Vet, Jun 66 - Dec 67

  6. #6
    thomae
    Guest

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    Ignorant question here:
    I am afraid I don't understand why the action now would sit higher in the stock?
    I thought bedding (in essence) only filled the existing nooks and crannies so that the action sits in a perfect 3 dimensional mirror of itself so that it (the action) can't move relative to the stock.

    When one beds the action, doesn't one tighten the action screws to pull the action into the same position it was prior to bedding?

    Perhaps I am missing something. I thought I understood bedding (although I have NOT actually done it myself) and want to make sure I truly do understand so when I do, I don't make mistakes.

    Thanks in advance for your patience.

  7. #7
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    Make sure you read the entire post on Snipershide about bedding rifles. It shows pics of allot of guns and explains some of the differences in them. The first part explains why you don't tighten the action screws, because it might induce stress. Basically, you just want to line the ejection port where it is level with the stock along the side, making sure the tang is still floated. You do this by adding tape around the barrel. The tape also floats the barrel. My barrel, like allot of Stevens, was contacting the stock at the left tip. After bedding it in this manner, it was centered in the stock and floating to the barrel nut. Before bedding, the ejection port was setting below the stock and the barrel wasn't floating all the way. Ligning the port up raised the action just a little and caused the feeding problem.

  8. #8
    thomae
    Guest

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    jsthntn247 :
    Got it. Thanks for your patience and a good explanation.
    All the best,

  9. #9
    dfwbob
    Guest

    Re: Stevens .223 review

    I have two of the Stevens 200's in .223 one is center feed the other is stagger feed. The center feed shoots better for some reason. I really like both of them. The stagger feed was a little under $ 300.00 and the center feed was under $ 200.00, both were new in the box. The only thing I did to them was add new triggers.

    Thanks for the range reports and the loading data.

Similar Threads

  1. Savage review 11/111 & Stevens 200
    By 98dyna in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-23-2018, 12:04 PM
  2. 12 BR review
    By 69daytona in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2016, 01:53 PM
  3. Article: Stevens 555 Over/Under Shotgun Review
    By J.Baker in forum Article Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-01-2016, 09:22 PM
  4. MOVED: Stevens .223 review
    By 82boy in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 09:43 AM
  5. Stevens 200 in 270, review
    By rickt300 in forum 110-Series Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-23-2010, 06:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •