Printable View
I heard somwhere that the stock bases on the 93 series are actually bad. Somthing like they are not the correct demensions and after looking at myn i noticed the rings dont seem to grab the base all to well... Has anybody else heard this or witnessed this? If so is their any 1 peice bases for the 93???? I've looked on weaver and leupold and i cant find any 1 peices. And leupold does t even make bases for that! Also why very little accessories for this very popular gun?
My Weaver rings do not fit on the factory bases. A 2-7 Leupold is maxed out on windage and elevation to get on paper. I'm waiting on a new set of bases.
Dang... I cant believe it maxed it out to get on paper. I think i may do the same. Might have to give in and get the 2 peice mount though..
Considering how supposedly accurate your rifle is now, I wouldn't change a thing.
Thats 4 shots btw
And that wasnt bench resting it.. I had a jacket under it thats it
Distance?Quote:
Originally Posted by goodolsavage
25yards. Not a huge distance but i wasnt bench resting it and i was only getting it zeroed.
Check DIP for a 1 piece.
http://www.diproductsinc.com/Products.aspx?CAT=3602
Oh wow a 25 moa singe peice base! I must get this... Thanks a tons
I don't have any of their products but have read it is considered good quality.
I will soon be ordering bottom metal and TG for my mark II to go with a Boyd's stock.
BTW You are welcome... ;o)
Speaking of boyds.. I was thinking about getting the tacticool stock for my 17
Are all their stocks wood?
I have not ordered mine yet ; I will probably get a RIMFIRE HUNTER as I like a conventional stock for it ; also it has a raised comb for the ridiculous height needed to mount a scope on these mark II rifles.
Laminated.
I feel ya.. Even though the BV model has a "raised" comb i still stress my neck. And i litteraly cant put my scope lower.. I seen that on that website and its a must need lol