Why is the Accu-trigger soooo ugly??? A Glock trigger looks similar in design on a smaller scale but is no where near as ugly as the Accu-trigger. why is it not solid and black or gold or polished???
Edited by mod:
Printable View
Why is the Accu-trigger soooo ugly??? A Glock trigger looks similar in design on a smaller scale but is no where near as ugly as the Accu-trigger. why is it not solid and black or gold or polished???
Edited by mod:
Hadn't noticed.
I removed some of your wording so it falls in line with the site rules.
As for the accutrigger, if you dont like the looks of it take it out. The design is a safety feature and it works as designed. Only so much you can do as far as looks go.
Personally i think it looks fine.
I've grown quite fond of them. Especially the safety blade. Reminds me of my Glocks.
The difference between the factory trigger on my .243, which had to be yanked with 2 hands, & the accutrigger is incredible.
Sorry about that, the weird cutouts and detents with the unfinished color of the metal just strike me as weird. I did search Google and saw one in gold color, looked much better. http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/12/18/2ynebere.jpg
Is the accutrigger stainless? If so, I'm gonna polish mine.
I love my accutrigger.
I don't like the way they look at all, but I like the way they work.
I don't feel it's ugly at all. It's "different" compared to old school, fine knurled triggers, wood and steel. Glocks were new and different at one time and those safetiess threw me for a while, but they worked, and we got used to them. Accutrigger feels good to me, they shoot nice. Marlin and Mossberg have similar. :cool:
Sure RP, we need all kinds of opinions or it would be no fun at all:p
So anyone know if the accutrigger part with the holes in it is stainless?
Now you made me get mine out for a look see,I only have two of the accutrigger,one on a 17hmr and one on new B-Mag,the one on B-Mag much better looking.Both are better looking than the triggers on my .223 Edge and .308 Axis,HAHA
I keep seeing this thread resurface and got to thinking. It made my brain hurt but I got thinking anyway....
I really can't see my accutrigger from where I sit when I'm getting ready to torch one off. As long as it makes the rifle go BANG (or BOOM) and the bullet leaves the pipe going very, very fast and I see whatever is on the receiving end falls down / has a hole in it, I could really care less what they look like.
There.
I said my piece...
Where's the **** aspirins.
I like the way my accutrigger looks.
And if you think anything about Glocks are pretty I am glad you didn't pick my wife for me.
I don't buy them to look pretty. I don't care for shiny cool looking weapons. I have no use for anything that is less than 114% reliable. My Glocks do just that and I can do any most anything to them with easily obtainable parts.
I can't say the same for any of my 3 ex-wives.
I saw one of the new Glock at a shop it had a big windowed out spot in the slide all the metal got Cerakote it looked pretty dang nice! I couldn't believe it was a Glock.
the symmetry of the Bmag looks better IMHO YMMV.. http://www.gunblast.com/images/Savage-Bmag/DSC09058.jpg
IMO the Accutrigger blade is a poor crutch for sloppy manufacturing and ugly to boot.
I much prefer a worked 3 screw for both form and function. I like the results with the three screw (and even the two screw) so much that one of them lives still on my fully custom 116. Just didn't see the point of spending the money for an aftermarket trigger when the worked three screw is nearly on par with my Jewell trigger.
Stang, regrettably, the Accu-trigger was developed prior to the introduction of your new 15* rolled scope mount; hence no 15* trigger pulls are allowed. Only standard 0* pulls. 😜
Hatin? Heck I'm just jealous man! That thing should be patented