Hello! Savage 14/114 Questions!

Hi everyone,
I'm new here, and super interested in a Savage rifle. After perusing their website, I found the American Classic 14. It's a really nice looking gun. I will want to add a Bushnell scope and probably a bipod to it. I am interested in this type of rifle because it reminds me of the basic traditional rifles that served the military and hunters since the beginning and is a timeless design.

My main purpose for the gun will be fun target shooting of random objects with a high power round up to 100 yards or so. I already have a 10/22 so a bigger bolt-action rifle is next on the list. I may do some deer or boar hunting down the line since I can hunt legally in my area, but it's not a top priority.

I have mostly settled on the .308 WIN because it's a common, semi-affordable round that is proven and good for all around shooting.

My questions are: What are your thoughts on my choice compared to other options on the market, including the other Savage models? Is there something I might be overlooking? What scope and bipod would you recommend for all around shooting (nothing super crazy or expensive)? I will primarily shoot from a table or the prone position. Thank you :becky:

Welcome and good choice on the 14....Complete classic with all the bells and whistles.....Good luck.
Scopes are endless depending on your preference and budget...SWFA, Leupold, Vortex, Nikon, Burris, Weaver, Primary Arms, etc.

I'm also partial to the classic look of walnut rifle stocks. The Savage 14/114 AC is one of my favorites along with Savage 11/111 LWH. Caliber is a personal choice. I would also look at the 6.5 Creedmoor as an option to fit you needs for target, deer and boar. Less recoil will translate into smaller groups at the bench. When it comes to scopes, bipods, etc., buy the best you can afford from proven brands with a no-hassle warranty and good resale value. My choice would be a Harris bipod and Leupold VX-3i 4.5-14x40mm scope to get the compact, classic look and feel you desire.

I've done several Savage builds over the years using Savage 14/114 stocks. My latest build was with a Savage 16 LWH barreled action in 6.5 Creedmoor and Savage 14 AC stock from Numrich Gun Parts. I replaced the hard rubber recoil pad with a Pachmayr Decelerator "Old English" recoil pad and used SS metal bottom parts. The picture is with a Harris bipod, Burris Signature Zee rings, Weaver Grand Slam 2-piece bases and Leupold VX-3i 3.5-10x40mm CDS scope. I also use steel wool between several coats of Tru-Oil to enhance the factory finish and give the stock a classic satin finish. With use you are going to get some wear and tear. After hunting season, I raise any wood dings with a wet cloth and iron. Then use Tru-Oil and 600 grit wet/dry sand paper to gently wet/dirty sand and fill any marks in the wood. Go easy and don't sand through the factory finish into the bare wood.

I have a 114 30/06 . It’s a great rifle . At the time it was the best savage had in their lineup .keep in mind if you get a 114 as typical with savage long actions you might need a long one piece mount depending on your eye relief .i have a bushnell 3200 elite on mine with a Caldwell bipod


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow thanks guys, that was quick!

jpdown, that savage is beautiful - very similar to what I'm looking to get. It sounds like you can build whatever you want as the parts are interchangeable between models? I definitely prefer the blued barrel over the stainless, but it's certainly not bad by any means. Probably a lot more durable and requires less maintenance too. I was also looking at the LWH as I'm sure it's a lot easier to carry around - every pound makes a big difference. Does it kick a lot more given the lower weight, or are there any downsides to the hollowed out parts?

I only have experience with Bushnell scopes - I have them on my other guns and they work great, but I'd be open to other options. It's just a little overwhelming because there are so many options!!! I have a 4-12 x 40 Banner on my pellet rifle and it's great. Adjustable focus, zoom, and elevation. I don't think it has any fancy coatings, but works fine for me. I probably want a similar version for the 14. Maybe with more zoom (18x?) for longer range shots down the line.

So, about that chambering. I've definitely heard great things about 6.5 Creedmor, and it sounds like it's becoming a very popular round. At .256" it is narrow and long, able to maintain speed and accuracy better compared to a .308 and with similar energy. Will the average joe really notice? I know I'll notice the extra cost (almost 2.5X the cost per round). Really worth it?


Thanks for your super quick replies - much appreciated.

If you go with a bushnell go with their elite series . You will be glad you did . Also I have a limber saver slip on pad and with 150 grain bullets I don’t really feel recoil from the rifle . I bought mine for 580 out the door in 05 can’t do that now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Based on my research, .30-06 and .308 are very similar rounds, so if you can't feel the recoil too much then that's reassuring.

Edit: Also, I heard this model was discontinued at some point some years back? And then it was also made available in a stainless barrel, and also available with a different stock finish. I think the current setup looks great. I have seen then online for $700 or so. Of course here in CA I have to spend another $40 or so to pick it up from the local shop.

Mine is the dbm I thought that was the one discontinued . Wish my 270 was one of them . I settled for the Stevens 200 instead


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dbm?

I am liking the looks of this. http://bushnell.com/hunting/rifle-sc...500/6-24x-40mm

I'll do some more research and come back with my final build before ordering, and then of course post up some pics when it's all done :)

Detachable box magazine . I prefer that over blind magazines . Or hinged floor plates


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ahh I see. It looks like it's still a dbm according to the site.

I like the older Bushnell elites. I wish Sightron still made the Big Sky! What a scope compared to the Bushnell.

Curious what they run now o know it’s not under 600


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quick follow up question...
I am realizing that the different 10/110 series actually share a lot of the same parts. You're only getting a different stock or barrel. Are there any other benefits to the 14 that make it more valuable than say a 10?

Savage only sells one model of the 14 here in the US. The American Classic. It is a wood stocked carbon steel rifle with a detachable magazine and a bottom bolt release. At one time the rifles were blued very nicely and they were top released. I think you might have been able to get one in stainless( or maybe that was a wood stocked 16).

With the exception of different trim like top or bottom bolt release with corresponding trigger guard, detachable mag/custom mag and magwell, barrel dimensions and bolt spring revisions etc... they are basically all the same. Short action 10, 11, 12, 14, 16. Long Action 110, 111, 112, 114, 116.

I do notice that on the 14 they say "barrel color: blued", while all the others say "barrel color: black". No idea if that means they're actually different or what. Not like it really matters.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...4f8be6c73b.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

.308 is a good all around chambering but, one other caliber you may want to consider is the .243. Little lighter recoil and little flatter shooting. Plenty of power for deer hunting, also useful for varmints like ground hogs.

Looks like another good option, but I already went with the .308! Now I get to jump through the hoops to actually get it here in CA.

It looks like I will also need a base and rings for whatever scope I end up with. Looking at Weaver for those bits.

Can't wait! :smile-new:

Any thoughts on 1 piece vs 2 piece bases?

I'm looking at the Weaver 2 piece steel base with Weaver steel grand slam rings. I actually like the idea of a 1 piece base better, but I've read it doesn't make a difference and could actually interfere with accessing the bolt area on some rifles.

I think I've settled on the Elite 4500 4-16X40 scope too. Seems like a solid scope without breaking the bank too bad.

I bought a one piece with the hope of better alignment for my 12fv. It does limit finger room fiddling with shells. My model 11 came with a two piece, works great.

Excuse my ignorance, but can a shell ever hit the scope on its way out? Would a one piece base prevent that? (probably a really dumb question)

I use the Weaver Grand Slam two piece bases, S46 on rear and S405 on front. Or, the Burris Xtreme Tactical two piece bases. These are the only two piece base sets I've found that will allow proper scope eye relief on a Savage SA or LA receiver. Especially with the shorter tubed scopes. Burris Signature Zee rings with the inserts are the best I've found for use with Weaver-style base.

I am picky about eye adjustment so I have a 1 piece mount . I have one on a Stevens 270 too. None have interfered with the bolt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I got my Savage 14!

I noticed a few differences from what I expected. It does not have wrap-around checkering on the foregrip any more. Instead it has the more traditional side-only checkering. The stock is also a raw wood rather than a gloss lacquer finish. The barrel has a matte black finish rather than gloss blued.

Not problems as it still feels nice, but they must have changed it in recent history. I will post up a pic as soon as I get my scope mounted.

I have heard this ...and they are pricier too now . Last ones I saw in my area were the stainless ones which were being discontinued at the time . Post a picture when you can


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have a Model 14 Classic LH in .243 Win. Bought it three years ago. It has the high-gloss, blued version (maybe, I can't really tell in this light).

It was the only one on the rack, and have never seen another LH one since. Savage still lists the 14 Classic, but not in LH anymore; otherwise, I think it would be listed on their website product offerings.

bobbyj.

Finally got around to taking some pics. I love it! Need to sight it in accurately still, but it's close.

Thanks for all your help guys. I ended up using the Bushnell 2.5-15 x 50 illuminated scope with Warne low rings on Weaver 2 piece bases with the extended front base to bring it towards the rear, exactly as you suggested. It fits nice and low with the Butler creek flip up caps. Also a blackhawk bipod, even though it doesn't really fit this style of rifle lol.

https://i.imgur.com/yQT8Paw.jpg

Looks good!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jpdown

I'm also partial to the classic look of walnut rifle stocks. I've done several Savage builds over the years using Savage 14/114 stocks.

---

Stock looks great. Love the looks of the 14's.

Some of jpdown's work is now at my place. Thanks JP!

Attachment 4621

wbm, you've got her looking good!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by savageCA

I already went with the .308!

---

308 is a good choice in the 14. How does it shoot?

Thanks JP. Went with a 6.5 Creedmoor. Sent pics to my son in Yellowstone. He is ready to take possession. Wonder why?:cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wbm

Stock looks great. Love the looks of the 14's.

Some of jpdown's work is now at my place. Thanks JP!

Attachment 4621

---

Very nice. I like the lustre and character of your stock. Mine is more of a satin oiled finish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wbm

308 is a good choice in the 14. How does it shoot?

Thanks JP. Went with a 6.5 Creedmoor. Sent pics to my son in Yellowstone. He is ready to take possession. Wonder why?:cool:

---

It goes bang. Fits me well. Trigger feels good. I still need to spend the time to accurately sight it in at 100yds, so I can't comment on the precision quite yet. Still trying to figure out an ammo situation here in CA without spending $1.25 a round for the cheap stuff.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by savageCA

Finally got around to taking some pics. I love it! Need to sight it in accurately still, but it's close.

Thanks for all your help guys. I ended up using the Bushnell 2.5-15 x 50 illuminated scope with Warne low rings on Weaver 2 piece bases with the extended front base to bring it towards the rear, exactly as you suggested. It fits nice and low with the Butler creek flip up caps. Also a blackhawk bipod, even though it doesn't really fit this style of rifle lol.

https://i.imgur.com/yQT8Paw.jpg

---

What a good looking rifle ! Glad it’s working out for you . Not much talk here about the 114s and 14s


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk