Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
play with the seating depth and you could make that look better :)
Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Avenger
play with the seating depth and you could make that look better :)
..What he say...lol... ;)...Look's like the Wolf's are just a touch hotter than the 210's or 9 1/2's...
Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
1Shot,
I'll probably have to do another accuracy test, the wind gust were murder today and I wasn't shooting too good either. Definitely an off day... :-[
Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
Thanks for doing this test. Very good info.
Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
Not sure at which range you are testing but you should do atleast 200-300 yards. Also I would suggest a 10 shot group to get the best average otherwise you may be basing decisions off of inconclusive results. Too bad you did not have an winchester large rifle primers, people seem to have great results with them in .308 and 06 size cases. Thanks for the results though I know it takes a lot of time and work.
Re: Wolf Primers- Anyone have any Real Data- ES/SD/ Accuracy vs. CCIBr or Fed210M?
I did all the load testing at 100 yards but next time I'll try 200. I'll need to locate some heavier targets too, the ones I was using were too thin and not producing good holes to measure. But this was more about velocity, ES, and SD this time around. Next time it's group testing all the way! I don't really enjoy chronograph work!