Printable View
Found a person who has a model 99S in 243 that's looking to trade it for a 300 in model 99. Says his is a 60's version and that those are a "harder caliber"(in 243) to find. My 300 is an early 50's version I know condition plays a big factor in making the decision. But can anyone verify what he is telling me is true and what exactly I could look for to make sure it is what he claims.. thanks for your input. Also what year did they stop putting the schnabel forearm on? TY
The 243 of the period was part of the 99EG lineup. The .243 caliber was added to the line in late 1955, and made essentially from 1956-60. The EG was the last Savage 99 to have the schnabel forearm. .243 is indeed one of the scarcer calibers, and if it is an EG, that adds about 25% to the value, according to the book. Also, the factory moved the "Savage 99" marking to the left side of the receiver top and provided factory drilled holes for a scope mount. But it is quite important that the wording is on the left, rather than on top... if on top, with holes drilled through the letters, it devastates the value (I wouldn't go near it, personally). Condition is everything, but it might be a fine trade if the condition is similar, and no non factory holes are added. I would sure trade a 300 for a 243, even if I had to pay a bit extra. Lee
I have a pic of the 243 but it does not have the Schnabel forearm. The person told me it's a model 99 s
There is no such thing as an "S". It might be an R, or if it has a receiver sight, then it is an RS, worth a bit more. Both were made through 1958-60. Lee
Lee... I sent u a message it's a model 99 DL series "A". What all things should I look for.. thanks
Also words are on the side. So it would be factory drilled