260 rem vs. 7mm-08 vs. 280 rem. Which of the 3 makes the best caliber for whitetail deer?
Printable View
260 rem vs. 7mm-08 vs. 280 rem. Which of the 3 makes the best caliber for whitetail deer?
280 should have more power then a 7 -o8. hard to beat a 6.5 bullet though.
.30-30 still probably holds the record for most kills.
In the end, your the only one to care, the deer is dead.
Any of the three are more than enough for Whitetail at any reasonable range.
I like the 7/08 BUT it's not better then the 280! They are equal except that the 280 will hold more powder. I don't think that's an advantage, but some might disagree. My 7/08 shoots 140TSX's over H414 in a 24" barrel Rem700 at 3050fps. I had the 7/08 and can make great brass from 308 Lapua brass so that was easy. If I had a 280 then I would have gone that way. The 260 is great but you can't get into the heavy bullets, not like you would need them for deer anyway.
Doug No Help I know!
Quite honestly it doesn't make an ounce of difference on Whitetail.
My personal vote is the 260. Their sectional density can take those bullets deeper than most all else.
Give me a .260 in a 26" barrel for hunting. Bench work I would go with a 28" or 30" barrel with a heavier contour. Great round with limited recoil. Really shines at long distance too.
260 Remington
140 GR. NOS PART H4831 .264" 2.780" 43.0 2568 53,000 PSI 45.7 2686 59,000 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART Hybrid 100V .264" 2.780" 37.0 2464 49,500 PSI 41.0C 2670 58,400 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 4831 .264" 2.780" 44.0 2715 57,000 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART H4350 .264" 2.780" 39.0 2530 51,900 PSI 42.0 2677 58,800 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART H414 .264" 2.780" 38.0 2496 50,700 PSI 41.0 2656 58,800 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 4350 .264" 2.780" 43.0 2715 57,000 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART 760 .264" 2.780" 38.0 2496 50,700 PSI 41.0 2656 58,800 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART H380 .264" 2.780" 37.0 2434 51,200 PSI 40.0 2594 58,900 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART Varget .264" 2.780" 34.0 2469 53,300 PSI 36.0 2578 59,400 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 4320 .264" 2.780" 36.0 2600 57.600 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 4064 .264" 2.780" 36.0 2615 56,900 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART BL-C(2) .264" 2.780" 34.0 2412 52,800 PSI 36.6 2557 59,000 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 4895 .264" 2.780" 35.5 2605 57,600 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART H4895 .264" 2.780" 32.0 2367 50,500 PSI 34.3 2517 58,400 PSI
140 GR. NOS PART IMR 3031 .264" 2.780" 32.5 2505
280 Rem
140 GR. NOS PART H4831 .284" 3.230" 54.0 2732 41,000 CUP 58.5 2927 48,500 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART Hybrid 100V .284" 3.230" 50.0 2669 41,300 CUP 54.0C 2847 47,000 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART H4350 .284" 3.230" 50.0 2756 41,900 CUP 53.5 2918 48,500 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART H414 .284" 3.230" 47.0 2710 41,800 CUP 51.0 2867 47,900 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART 760 .284" 3.230" 47.0 2710 41,800 CUP 51.0 2867 47,900 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART Varget .284" 3.230" 42.0 2674 41,400 CUP 45.5 2838 48,100 CUP
140 GR. NOS PART H4895 .284" 3.230" 42.0 2711 43,200 CUP 45.2 2830 48,400 CUP
145 GR. SPR SP H4831 .284" 3.160" 48.0 2579 46,900 CUP 53.0 2727 50,000 CUP
243 is a killing machine and deer do not take at lot to bring them down. Data however on the cartridges given does not show any equality between the 260 and the 280.
Choice most times is based upon circumstances only the user can determine.
1. recoil?
2. Range?
3. Will the cartridge be used on larger game?
Neal
.4 Are you likely to get in a lot of practice with it?
For whitetail deer all will do fine and the deer won't know the difference. The 280 should do about 200 fps more than the others with similar weight bullets at similar pressures and should handle heavier bullets ( not needed for deer) better. I see some pretty big claims for the 7mm-08 on the internet and while I don't doubt they may be true, I am 99% sure there are some pretty high pressures involved. Having said all of that I would probably go with the 7mm-08 , 260 and 280 in that order, because I like short action rifles. I might opt for the 260 first as I tend to like to be the odd man out when it comes to rifles. Just my .02
.30-30 AI ftw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Avenger