PDA

View Full Version : what to rebarrel to????



Pages : [1] 2

roughneck065
12-19-2016, 09:46 PM
Picked up a savage NIB 111 270 win. Got if for practically free off of a trade that I did really well on. I was thinking 280ai cause I love tinkering around on the reloading bench. I was also thinking 338-06 or 35 whelen also kinda torn between the three. It will be primarily a whitetail gun the way im setting up. Any other ideas?????

SageRat Shooter
12-20-2016, 10:56 AM
Roughneck,

My dad is a man who has the "Bigger is always better" school of thought, so I can say that the 338-06 is one heck of a cannon for shooting whitetail. I do understand the enjoyment of tinkering on the loading bench however. I'm not sure if you are from that same school of thought, but maybe just think about staying with the 270 as that is a great deer cartridge, or perhaps think about a 6.5 Creedmoor or a .260 Remington. With the high BC of the 6.5 bullets you get plenty of penetration at normal hunting ranges. Hornady has even come out with a high BC 270 bullet (.536) at 145 grains... ELD-X

Just a couple other options for you to tinker with....

roughneck065
12-20-2016, 11:52 AM
I have alot of the standard cals so thats why i was kinda thinking some "different" for this one. Im hearing so many good things about this 338-06

SageRat Shooter
12-20-2016, 12:38 PM
it is a really nice rifle. My dad uses his on everything from Deer to Elk.... His is a Kimber (spelling?) he's got 2 full sized safes full of rifles and he usually only pulls out the 338-06 for everything except prairie dogs.... And that's probably because it's just too expensive to shoot that many rounds in a day or two.... :)

roughneck065
12-20-2016, 12:44 PM
Haha i hear ya on that...i think im gonna do little more research on that now...thanks alot for the input!!!

Robinhood
12-20-2016, 05:50 PM
280 or 280 AI

roughneck065
12-20-2016, 07:44 PM
robinhood the 280ai is very impressive and that is what I originally had planned. I wonder how a shorter barreled one would perform most of the data you see is for 26" barrel. Id like to keep it at 24 or even 22 wouldn't bother me.

WV1951
12-20-2016, 10:33 PM
Gotta think that 270 is a great round and versatile for most NA game. Maybe keep it at 270 and use some your funds for a better stock upgrade than planned and better glass than planned. If it still just doesn't work for you, you can always later change caliber.

roughneck065
12-20-2016, 11:33 PM
Wv1951-i have a 700 and model 70 in 270 i killed lots of deer with with this being a more the less free action why i was looking for something different...love the 270 but just want something unique i guess you could say.

taylorce1
12-26-2016, 01:32 AM
.280 Rem/AI isn't realistically offer anything dramatically different over a .270 for a hunting rifle. I've owned the standard .280 and the 7mm Rem Mag trying to find out if they were truly better than my .270 Win. There isn't a .284 caliber rifle in my safe and I own two .270 Win rifles.

I've owned my share of .338-06 and .35 Whelen rifles and I prefer the .338-06. Still have two rifles in that cartridge, but don't currently have any Whelens. I shattered my leg and was out of work for a full year between paychecks, the Whelen rifles were easier to sell when times got tough. I'll own a Whelen again someday, maybe send my extra .338-06 off for a JES rebore.

I know I'm not much help with my response but most of my big game including elk has been killed killed with a .243 or a .270. I'd probably add a larger bore, before I'd go with something similar in performance to what I already owned and am satisfied with. Plus I'd think in this day and age of the internet you'd be more unique to stay .270 Win.

darkker
12-26-2016, 11:29 PM
So, I get the "be different" view. But seriously, a 338 that's larger than the Federal... For whitetail???!!
Confucius say no use cannon to kill fly.

If you like different, and since you have the parent case already; try the 6.5-06, or go over of the full sized Mausers.

taylorce1
12-27-2016, 12:58 AM
So, I get the "be different" view. But seriously, a 338 that's larger than the Federal... For whitetail???!!
Confucius say no use cannon to kill fly.


I've used the .338-06 and .375 Ruger on pronghorn, 200 grain bullets in the .338 and 270 grains in the .375. They worked beautifully and I wouldn't hesitate to use them again. They didn't kill as dramatically as some smaller faster cartridges, but I didn't nearly have the blood shot meat either. Big entrances even bigger edits, no bullets recovered but all the animals were.

toddcdozer
12-27-2016, 01:20 AM
I shoot an Edge at EVERYTHING. PDs, turtles, dragonflies, deer, rocks. A 300gr SMK going 2850 works on anything breathing or being a mineral. Rocks stand no chance.

darkker
12-27-2016, 02:15 AM
Never claimed the monster cartridges wouldn't kill anything, I claim there is no deaderer. For a goal of whitetail, I don't understand the appeal.

Sure running around the frat house killing flies with a hammer is fun, but are you still going to use the hammer if the fly lands on your head?
Perhaps a cartridge that can be used for something else as well, and be enjoyed. Can a 300gr bullet be used for rock chucks? Yes. Can you kill flies with a hammer? Yes.

alltherage
12-27-2016, 09:49 AM
6.5x55, 7mm-08,6.5x47, 7x57

yobuck
12-27-2016, 03:52 PM
[QUOTE=darkker;391411]Never claimed the monster cartridges wouldn't kill anything, I claim there is no deaderer. For a goal of whitetail, I don't understand the appeal.

Its got nothing at all to do with appeal, or making things deaderer.
Next time you go out and shoot your favorite cartridge at a distance beyond say 1200 yards, try to find someone owning a large capacity 338 to go along.
One shot from each with you sitting behind watching is all it would take.

taylorce1
12-28-2016, 08:35 AM
It isn't about making things deader, it's about using it because you have it. A .338-06 or Whelen is no where near a super sized cartridge, they're based off of a .30-06. Now recoil from both can be downright brutal depending on a lot of factors, but it can be as well out of smaller cartridges.

White tail deer aren't extremely hard to kill, but then again most animals aren't. A well placed bullet with adequate construction and enough penetration into vitals tends to work well regardless of animal size. I'm not a minimalist either, though I've killed white tail with .223 and 6- 222 RM rifles. I tend to hunt with the rifles I own, and sometimes that means that I use them on smaller game than I imagined I ever would.

Some places still require use of shotguns only, others only .35 caliber and up and funky length requirements, or a .35 Wheels in a single shot rifle with exposed hammer is the choice for primitive hunting seasons in some states. However, I can tell you most of the time someone uses a certain cartridge on an animal for hunting is because they one because they can, and two because owning something and not using it is boring. Using most modern rifle cartridges on white tail is overkill these days, when most die very easily to a patched round ball at subsonic speeds, or a or a pointy stick launched from a bow.

darkker
01-01-2017, 02:08 AM
Its got nothing at all to do with appeal, or making things deaderer.
Next time you go out and shoot your favorite cartridge at a distance beyond say 1200 yards, try to find someone owning a large capacity 338 to go along.
One shot from each with you sitting behind watching is all it would take.

If it has nothing to do with deadener or appeal, then what is the business about 1200 yards; and how does that relate to hunting whitetail?? Watching that shot will change my mind without appealing to me?
You know I already shoot farther than that with several cartridges. I don't need to find a large capacity 338, I have one. Or I can grab the Barrett in the safe.

I don't know any small cartridges that provide "brutal" recoil, but that only furthers my point.


As I originally stated for the OP: I get the wanting to be different part, I don't get the appeal of a cannon for a whitetail. Build something different if you like, build several of them! Build something different, that you can take hunting whitetails. But building a monster FOR hunting whitetails, I don't get.

Ever shoot a whitetail with a 338-378? Turns them inside out, and you aren't eating anything.

taylorce1
01-01-2017, 10:26 PM
I don't know any small cartridges that provide "brutal" recoil, but that only furthers my point.


Recoil is far more dependant on stock fit and shape than cartridge size. I'll take shooting multiple rounds with either of the Whelen rifles I used to own with 225 grain bullets over shooting a box of 170 grain bullets out of my old M94 .30- 30. I've been behind lightning fast kicking light weight rifles that were no fun to sight in as well most based off of a .308 case. There is a lot more to felt recoil than cartridge size and bullet diameter.


Ever shoot a whitetail with a 338-378? Turns them inside out, and you aren't eating anything.

No it doesn't, and if it does then you used way to fragile of a bullet for the cartridge. Just like all bullets arent created equal, neither are all white tail deer there is a wide variety in sizes they come in. If you properly pair a bullet to your cartridge capabilities then you'll rarely ever have an issue with any size of game you use it on. My buddy has used his .375 H&H to shoot Duiker in Africa and it didn't turn anything inside out and it made a nice full body mount that sits on a ledge in his house.

schnyd112
01-02-2017, 12:16 AM
Sorry but I need to ask some questions now. What are you shooting from a .308 case that is so bad recoiling? I will admit the win 70 featherweight in .270 is not for the faint of heart, but it has nothing on a 7 RUM in a Rem 700 sendero. And a win model 94 in 30-30? Now a marlin guide gun in 45-70? That will kick your butt but it is still way bigger than any .308 Based case I have ever seen.

375 h&h is a totally different animal than a 338-378 wby. The 338-378 is a high energy, fast moving cartridge. The 375 h&h is heavy deep penetrating, slower moving cartridge. 338-378 shooting a 225-250 g bullet is designed to dump energy on impact. The h&h is made to push that heavy (300g) bullet as deep as it can, boring a big hole through bone, muscle and hide. Hence the missing backside of a deer when hit with a 338-378. I have never seen the 338 version, but I have experience with a 30-378 wby and it absolutely wrecked a mulie buck at 400 yards, close to a 6" exit on the far shoulder. No good meat on the right side ahead or the ribcage. That rifle now has a different owner.