plinkin
11-29-2013, 09:54 PM
Hi, I haven't heard the rumor about the Douglas bbl, but I hope it's true! The last Magazine article about the rifle, said the bbl got super hot. That's of no real concern to me, since we have no small, plentiful varmints here in Florida. I always take my time shooting, anyway.
I did replace the Bolt handle and it's much better. One of my past postings explained the stock 'flex'. It's not really the fore end. I had the gun in my vise and was looking at ways to beef up the stock. (I've done this to several Axis rifles and it's easy to do)...
Well, the flex occurs where the mag well area is. There ain't no way to overcome it, except for a new stock. It's just WAY TOO THIN
'amidships', as we used to say in the Navy.
Since there is now an aftermarket stock for the Axis, I can only hope, that company makes one for the B Mag.
Wait... I waited what seems forever to get this rifle. It 'needed' a new bolt, the bbl is too thin and the stock sucks. What!!!
All my other Savages rifles are excellent.
I still say that Savage should have used the Model 93R17 as the basis for this new round. The ctg itself is excellent, but the rifle is a disappointment ... at least to me.
I say this, as a VERY happy owner of a 93R17 TR......
ron
Ron,
time and time again I have said that Savage was looking to build a new rim fire that was not the Lakefield rifle. I personally believe that they could have build this rifle on a modified 93 rifle. They has built a single shot 22 Hornet in the model 93 as well as the model 40 which had a rim fire action. The model 25 is a hybrid rim fire action. The main purpose for the B.Mag is to redesign the rim fire line, period.
The WSM round gave them reasons to peruse that.
Oh and to everyone else. This registry that I started, although not my forum is my thread, was not meant for a crying section. If you want to cry about the gun start your own thread.
I did replace the Bolt handle and it's much better. One of my past postings explained the stock 'flex'. It's not really the fore end. I had the gun in my vise and was looking at ways to beef up the stock. (I've done this to several Axis rifles and it's easy to do)...
Well, the flex occurs where the mag well area is. There ain't no way to overcome it, except for a new stock. It's just WAY TOO THIN
'amidships', as we used to say in the Navy.
Since there is now an aftermarket stock for the Axis, I can only hope, that company makes one for the B Mag.
Wait... I waited what seems forever to get this rifle. It 'needed' a new bolt, the bbl is too thin and the stock sucks. What!!!
All my other Savages rifles are excellent.
I still say that Savage should have used the Model 93R17 as the basis for this new round. The ctg itself is excellent, but the rifle is a disappointment ... at least to me.
I say this, as a VERY happy owner of a 93R17 TR......
ron
Ron,
time and time again I have said that Savage was looking to build a new rim fire that was not the Lakefield rifle. I personally believe that they could have build this rifle on a modified 93 rifle. They has built a single shot 22 Hornet in the model 93 as well as the model 40 which had a rim fire action. The model 25 is a hybrid rim fire action. The main purpose for the B.Mag is to redesign the rim fire line, period.
The WSM round gave them reasons to peruse that.
Oh and to everyone else. This registry that I started, although not my forum is my thread, was not meant for a crying section. If you want to cry about the gun start your own thread.