Scope Recommendation-Axis .223

[Icyminnesota]

This is my second post. Thanks for those who replied to my other. Again..got a Savage Axis .223 with the factory budle Bushnell (3x9 40)on it. I was looking to replace it. I have a Center Point 4x16 40 on my 7.62 single shot that works pretty good. Was thinking of another CP but not sure.
Any suggestions on a scope under or around $100 that I might be a great buy vs performance? Looking at shots up to 200 yds maybe 300 yds max.

Thanks again for the help in advance. I am ordering a cheek riser and maybe a bipod for it also. When I hit the range I will post pics of target with setup and ammo used.

[fgw_in_fla]

You can do more with a $100 rifle with a $1000 scope, then a $1000 rifle with a $100 scope.

Just a few words of advice from yer 'ol Uncle Frank...


If it were me, I'd be looking at some of the year end sales on Vortex, Nikon, Bushnell, etc. (Cameraland, Midway, SWFA <---- they take trade ins, etc...)
But that's me.

Happy New Year,
Frank in Fla

[scope eye]

[QUOTE=fgw_in_fla;155774]You can do more with a $100 rifle with a $1000 scope, then a $1000 rifle with a $100 scope.

That has always been my problem, every time I save up enough for a decent scope, I end up buying an action or custom barrel, and am stuck with mediocre optics.
after years of frustration and banging my head, I am officially crying uncle,and going to go the better optics route, ya know If it wasn't for that d@mn classifieds I would be fine.

Dean

[jpdown]

For $100 dollars you'll end up with the same quality scope you've got now. I would take a look at the Vortex Crossfire II. Vortex is noted for their no hassle warranty if anything goes wrong. Check out CameraLand, a site vendor. Call, they may have some demo's at a discount price.

[thermaler]

Since you're firing 223 I assume you're not looking for a long range tactikool scope. Your CP might do OK--but I had one that blew up internally after a few 308 recoils--I won't even glance at them on the store shelf now.

My tastes and selections in scopes are evolving and I have a box loaded with useless combo package scopes and cheap low-enders--but I still like to find deals at lower prices.

If I'm doing variable magnification, my baseline is a minimum 14/16x capability for budget range scopes--9 x 12 just don't hack it for me even at 100 yds EXCEPT if it's by a manufacturer with really good glass--like Leupold. Usually you can get side focus to adjust for parallax to help with the lesser imagine quality on low to mid range scopes if you look hard--I wouldn't buy a 14x or better variable scope without it if at all possible.

Something else to consider: lately I've realized that I tend to use maximum magnification at all ranges possible--and the logic behind fixed magnification scopes started making more sense to me. Fixed mag scopes generally reduce the "fiddle diddle factor" and generally are less expensive than a variable magnification--so I consider them a viable way to "bootleg" your way into really good glass lenses and reticles on the cheap--case in point are Leupold and SWFA scopes. I have a 12x fixed SWFA SS scope on the way--the .1 mil mil reticle looks totally awesome for a $299 scope.

[Icyminnesota]

Good info so far. Looks like I may up my budget or try the Bushnell that's on the rifle now. Thermaler- I thought about a fixed scope. But sometimes find myself bringing the mag down at times. Maybe that is by habit.

[Blue Avenger]

Tight budget? Try ebay? Stick with someone that has good feedback and scopes with good warranty service. Light Ring marks drop the price on good scopes.

PS where is icy mn?

[Icyminnesota]

Well not an eBay person. And Icy Minnesota is just a user name I use. Not a town. It is cold here 2 degrees this morning. That and I like Ice fishing.

[J.Baker]

That has always been my problem, every time I save up enough for a decent scope, I end up buying an action or custom barrel, and am stuck with mediocre optics.
after years of frustration and banging my head, I am officially crying uncle,and going to go the better optics route, ya know If it wasn't for that d@mn classifieds I would be fine.

Dean

Well if you really, really want me to....I can block your access to the classifieds Dean. I mean, I'd be willing to help ya out like that cuz I'm just that kinda guy. :becky:

[Apache]

He's an addict!! LOL!!!

He'll find a way around it!!!

[gerard488]

I once read something ,somewhere, that made me stop and think, It was:
"Buy a rifle that you can afford and a scope that you can`t "

[scope eye]

If you really cared, you would have a support group section.

Me

[scope eye]

If you really cared, you would have a support group section.

Me

tanks for they offer Jim

It reverts back to my childhood, when all my friends had shinny new savages and had none.

[762X51]

The scope you have is a <$100 scope and any other <$100 scope you replace it with will just be a move sideways. I've always been fond of Burris scopes. Lately I've tried a Nikon and really liked it. I've gotten at least 5 Burris scopes all bought as refurbished units that look PERFECTLY NEW! I honestly don't know why they are listed as refurbs since there is NO WAY to tell them from new. The place I order them from usually has the Burris 3-9X Fullfield II for $169 and that usually includes a bonus like a free GPS or a pair of binoculars. They are currently available for $149 without a bonus item. The new 3-9X Fullfield E1 can be had for $141 but they are currently out. I bought one of the E1 models for my brother in law for Christmas and really like it since the ocular bell doesn't turn with the power adjustment like the Fullfield II does. They also currently have the Nikon ProStaff 3-9X matte black refurb for $119 which I can highly recommend. The refurb scopes are the best way to get high quality scopes at very reasonable prices. On a related note, if you're going to replace the cheapo scope then also replace the $5 Chinese pot metal rings that come with the XP package. The best rings on the planet are the Burris Signature Zee rings. The plastic insert in the Signature rings are a phenomenal design that allows adjustment in windage and elevation if needed and also protect your scope from ring marks while compensating for minor misalignments between front and back rings. I've used these rings for years and there are none better at any price and they can usually be had for less than $45. On the low end, a refurb Nikon ProStaff and a set of medium matte 1" Signature Zee rings can be had for about $160 plus shipping and you'll have a very nice scope package for a reasonable price.

[762X51]

Ohhh...and for what it's worth I too just recently bought an Axis .223. I just wanted the rifle but all that was available was the XP package. It was only $40 more so I got it. Took it to the range as it came from the box and shot SUB MOA GROUPS AT 200 YARDS!!! 5 shots into less than 1 MOA and 4 of the 5 into less than 1/2 MOA!!! This cheapo cheeseball rifle out shoots everything else I own! I've replaced the scope and rings with Burris Signature Zee rings and a Pentax scope but I can't imagine it'll shoot any better. When I replace the horribly heavy trigger with a decent Rifle Basix trigger who knows what this little econobanger can do???

[KYhunter112]

I'm new here, but i'll give my 2cents. A good scope goes a long way. I used the cheaper Bushnell that came mounted on my .270 and shot well. After a few month's of shooting I replaced the scope with a Nikon Prostaff (which is by no mean's a high dollar scope. With Weaver grand slam ring's and 3x9x50 scope I paid less than $300 mounted and bore sighted) and have improved my accuracy a lot.

[seanmurphy265]

I'm a 50mm scope fan all the way! I have a pro-staff 40mm scope with the bdc on my axis 30-06. I like the zoom, but my 50mm 3x9 on my 35 Whelen is much better in low light (hunting). I'm going to upgrade to a 50mm soon, it seems scopes decrease in price this time of year. I've had several emails with burris and weaver close outs and sales.

[macon]

i just bought a bushnell elite 3200,for 139 bucks on natchezz but they only come in silver. extremely nice glass for 139. i have a few of the vortex crossfires on 22s thats about all id use them for.

[n4ue]

Hello to all you fine folks.
My $.02 worth. Been shooting / reloading (for 29 calibers) for over 40 years.
Like many on this site, I am a sucker for cheap, er, inexpensive glass. Last year I purchased 3 new Axis rifles. The first one in 7-08, shot so good, I ended up getting a .223 and .243. I have high end rifles in these calibers, I wanted something to use for predator control on my buddy's farm. None of the rifles came with a scope. Fortunately (or unfortunately) I have 13 spare scopes. From Barska to Burris.
I recently purchased a new Nikon Monarch 4-16X42MM. I brought it and a handful of the spares to work and had my buddies (who hunt) look through them at a couple of targets 75 yards away. I withheld the cost of each. One of the WORST was the Monarch. For the $ it should have been # 1, but it just didn't look "right".... Nothing "wrong", hard to explain.......Just looked and felt like a toy.
One of the favorites was my Viper Vortex 4-16X50mm. I sent the Nikon back and bought another Vortex.
BUT, believe it or not, the Center Point 4-16X40mm, gathered a LOT of positive comments, and at the end, a couple of guys asked numerous times... "HOW much is this one (CP) again???". None of my 'economy' scopes are on anything more than some .243s. so don't know how they will hold up to your .416 Barrett.
Now having said that, I also own several Millett LRS-1s and several TSR-1s. I doubt if I will ever buy anything other than Vortex or Millett.
One last thing... In the early 70s, I got a terrific deal on a nib Rem 700 Varmint Special in .243. I was raising a family then and was pretty ashamed to have to put a Japanese Tasco 20X40MM scope on it. All my hunting buddies really rode me.
A couple of years ago, I replaced the Tasco, but it's optic quality (Japanese) still rivals anything comparable today. It really surprised me. I guess this is the same reason so many go nuts over the "Super Sniper" scopes, which are Japanese Tascos.....

Regards,
ron

[thermaler]

Hello to all you fine folks.
My $.02 worth. Been shooting / reloading (for 29 calibers) for over 40 years.
Like many on this site, I am a sucker for cheap, er, inexpensive glass. Last year I purchased 3 new Axis rifles. The first one in 7-08, shot so good, I ended up getting a .223 and .243. I have high end rifles in these calibers, I wanted something to use for predator control on my buddy's farm. None of the rifles came with a scope. Fortunately (or unfortunately) I have 13 spare scopes. From Barska to Burris.
I recently purchased a new Nikon Monarch 4-16X42MM. I brought it and a handful of the spares to work and had my buddies (who hunt) look through them at a couple of targets 75 yards away. I withheld the cost of each. One of the WORST was the Monarch. For the $ it should have been # 1, but it just didn't look "right".... Nothing "wrong", hard to explain.......Just looked and felt like a toy.
One of the favorites was my Viper Vortex 4-16X50mm. I sent the Nikon back and bought another Vortex.
BUT, believe it or not, the Center Point 4-16X40mm, gathered a LOT of positive comments, and at the end, a couple of guys asked numerous times... "HOW much is this one (CP) again???". None of my 'economy' scopes are on anything more than some .243s. so don't know how they will hold up to your .416 Barrett.
Now having said that, I also own several Millett LRS-1s and several TSR-1s. I doubt if I will ever buy anything other than Vortex or Millett.
One last thing... In the early 70s, I got a terrific deal on a nib Rem 700 Varmint Special in .243. I was raising a family then and was pretty ashamed to have to put a Japanese Tasco 20X40MM scope on it. All my hunting buddies really rode me.
A couple of years ago, I replaced the Tasco, but it's optic quality (Japanese) still rivals anything comparable today. It really surprised me. I guess this is the same reason so many go nuts over the "Super Sniper" scopes, which are Japanese Tascos.....

Regards,
ron

You say tomaeto...I say Tomahtoe. : )

My monarch has produced excellent groupings on all my heavy recoil rifles for years. Pretty much all I care about.

Haven't had my SS out to the range yet--but I got it because that's what a friend of mine uses (he was a combat sniper in Afghanistan) and he swears by it--I figured odds are if it was good enough for him I probably would not be disappointed.